File spoon-archives/anarchy-list.archive/anarchy-list_2003/anarchy-list.0307, message 123


Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ali Kazmi <thekazmis2001-AT-yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: owned vs. free market


> And you're right, the approximation of equilibrium
> price to embodied labor 
> assumes a free market, in which no privileged class
> of landlords or usurers 
> can  charge a monopoly price for access to land or
> capital.  That's why I'm 
> for a free market.

how does a free market equate to no privileged class,
no landlords, no usurers? or to put it another way, no
ownership of property, no capital or renting of
capital?


Cheers.

Ali


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005