Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:39:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Ali Kazmi <thekazmis2001-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: Re: owned vs. free market > And you're right, the approximation of equilibrium > price to embodied labor > assumes a free market, in which no privileged class > of landlords or usurers > can charge a monopoly price for access to land or > capital. That's why I'm > for a free market. how does a free market equate to no privileged class, no landlords, no usurers? or to put it another way, no ownership of property, no capital or renting of capital? Cheers. Ali __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005