Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 20:48:17 +0100 From: Iain McKay <iain.mckay-AT-zetnet.co.uk> Subject: Re: Workings of an ideal government hello all > MJ > How does one STEAL themselves? > Iain > Which is, of course, a lengthly way of saying "I don't agree > but I'm not going to bother refuting your argument, so there..." > Bastiat? Give me a break. Could you not quote an anarchist instead > of a capitalist? > MJ > Huh? You avoid the obvious ... attempt to project YOUR efforts > at avoiding the words, concepts and ideas presented ... while > glomming on to a 'tag line' as if it meant more than it stated and > presented itself. I'll explain it slowly. The Bastiat quote is an obvious reference to Proudhon's classic work "What is Property?" he answered that it was theft (i.e. plunder). Rather than refute that analysis, the Bastiat quote simply repeats the dogma that property cannot be plunder and so it fails to even address the issues Proudhon (and anarchism) raises. I've read Proudhon's work. It's critique of property is pretty powerful and has never been refuted. Bastiat's quote just shows the "sticking your figures in your ears" approach so beloved by capitalists. It also show how far capitalism is from anarchism. Iain
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005