From: "Dave Coull" <coull2-AT-btinternet.com>
Subject: RE: primitivism and anarchism
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:25:06 -0000



Iain asked


>> Surely a review in "Green Anarchy" would have been
>> by an anarchist primitivist? If so, then my initial 
>> question remains. Why would you call yourself an anarchist 
>> if you reject everything the name stands for politically?


and Greg suggests (apparently as an answer to that question,
if I have understood correctly)


> too many labels


No, that doesn't make sense.

That's a reason for  _not_  attaching labels to yourself.

But, again as I understand it, apparently the folk 
at "Green Anarchy" magazine _do_ call themselves anarchist.
So Iain's question remains un-answered. Why call yourself
an anarchist if you reject everything the name stands
for politically?

Dave C