Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:50:09 -0800 (PST) From: dave dorkin <ddorkin1-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: Re: primitivism and anarchism Exactly. I have often seen this problem with interested parties inquiring about anarchism. Dave --- Iain McKay <iain.mckay-AT-zetnet.co.uk> wrote: Why the fuss? Because people will read this sort of stuff and consider anarchists as mad and anarchism as little more than chaos. It also hinders the development of a movement which faces the problems it has now and in any revolution that happens. If you get > anarchists who dismiss the need for social organisation of "mass society", workers' control and so on, then if a revolution does happen then they will be unable to contribute positively to it -- no actual revolution or mass movement will be radical/revolutionary enough for them. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005