Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: "\[greg\] ®" <insektus-AT-yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Current Events


i thought they were manufactured in the US, then sent
to Canada and then shipped back (how that's cost
effective i don't know). that was a story i'd heard.
so generics aren't as good as name brands in meds? i
thought laws dictated that they had to be identical? 

am i missing something her. someone in the know please
straighten me out. thx.

greg

--- Ali Kazmi <thekazmis2001-AT-yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Does anyone know what corporation is leading in
> > medals at the Olympics?
> > Ali's home base, Canada, really sucks. 
> > Doesn't Canada have any corporate sponsors who can
> > buy non-detectable 
> > performance-enhancing durgs?
> 
> its the canadian drugs, they may be cheap, but they
> are not as effective. (FDA said so)
> 
> And no shoe contracts.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Ali
> 
> 
> 
> 		
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter
> now.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
> 


===='the naked need of the control addicts must be decently covered by an arbitrary and intricate bureaucracy so that the subject cannot contact his enemy direct.'
-william s burroughs


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail