File spoon-archives/aut-op-sy.archive/aut-op-sy_1997/aut-op-sy.9704, message 29

Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 02:44:37 +0200
Subject: Re: economics of communist societies

At 07.03 29/04/97 -0400, a self calling Luther Blissett (doesn't he know
that the LBs decided one month ago to sign Blissettt (with 3 t)? wrote.
> I am confused. In correspondence with the CWO, they rather patronisingly
>suggested that my rejection of Bolshevism was because I had "swallowed hook
>line and sinker the bourgeoise's message of nasty organisation and nasty
>bolsheviks" yet here Jock is describing the the GIK as revolutionaries. I
>am presently working on an electronic version of the GIK's "Theses on
>Bolshevism" which was also published as "The Bourgeois Role of Bolshevism".
>I thought that CWO was one of those proto-party organisations that prided
>itself on its political homogenity.
>Please clarify
>Luther Blissett

The CWO will reply if they think it worths. I state just a note:
one thing is a revolutionary group which mistaked (or mistake); o completely
different thing is the current that after more than half a century insist on
the mistake.
For example: there is a descending parabola amongst Trotsky trotskism and
trotskists, as amongst GIK, councilism and modern councilists -something else.
The Internationalists HomePage is at
There is also the link to the Home Page of Battaglia Comunista monthly organ of
Write to

     --- from list ---


Driftline Main Page


Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005