Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 07:48:20 +1000 From: pmargin-AT-xchange.anarki.net (Profit Margin) Subject: AUT: LL: ART:War on the Wharfies 8 May update >Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 22:15:21 +1000 >To: leftlink-AT-vicnet.net.au >From: takver-AT-onaustralia.com.au >Subject: LL: ART:War on the Wharfies 8 May update >Sender: owner-leftlink-AT-vicnet.net.au >Precedence: bulk >Status: > > >News Summary - Friday 8 May >War on the Wharfies Homepage: >http://www.users.bigpond.com/Takver/soapbox/index.htm > >CONTENTS >(8/5/98) Wharfies return to work around Australia >(8/5/98) The dirt from Dubai implicates P.M. >(8/5/98) Government under attack from International Unions > > >Recommended Websites: >Fremantle Community Picket > http://www.users.bigpond.com/picket/ >Find Peter's Heart! Web Game > http://www.houseoflove.com.au/ratbag/heartlessbastard/ > ----------------------------------- >News Summary - Friday 8 May >Wharfies return to work around Australia > >Wharfies returned jubilantly to work at East Swanson Dock in >Melbourne on Thursday evening, thus ending the four week picket >of the Patrick terminal. Other ports which have returned to work >include Port Botany in Sydney, Webb Dock in Melbourne, and Burnie >and Bell Bay in Tasmania. About nine or ten thousand containers >are estimated to be stranded on the wharves, which will take a >week to clear. The Brisbane terminals are expected to resume full >operations mid-afternoon Friday; security issues are still to be >resolved in Perth and Townsville; and there is uncertainty >surrounding Patrick's future in Adelaide. Patrick says it will >not be reopening its Newcastle port and its Tasmanian operations >are only re-opening temporarily to meet existing contracts. > >A move by Patrick yesterday to terminate its labour supply >agreements with the four companies in the group which employ >MUA members prompted the union to back down on its earlier >insistence that there would be no return to work until the >goon squads were removed. >(Source: ABC 8/5/98, Financial Review 8/5/98) > >Sea-Land chief attacks Government over waterfront levy >Captain Andy Andrews, in charge of SeaLand which presently >operates in Adelaide and will soon open a container terminal >in Brisbane, has attacked the Governments $250 million >redundancy fund as being an inequitable subsidy for its >competitors. >(Source: Financial Review 8/5/98) > >The dirt from Dubai implicates P.M. >In a sworn affidavit Mike Wells of Fynwest Pty Ltd, one of the >organisers of the Dubai debacle to train serving and former army >officers as scab labour on the waterfront, claims a Government >adviser (Dr Stephen Webster) rang him about the exercise last >July. Mike Wells says Dr Stephen Webster, now an adviser to >Workplace Relations Minister Peter Reith but then a Government >consultant on waterfront reform, told him he was doing a >"special job" for the Prime Minister. > >Passports for the recruits were organised with the assistance >of the Prime Ministers Office. One wonders what the involvement >of the Foreign Affairs Minister, Alexander Downer, was in all >this. Ian MacLachlan, the Defence Minister disclaims any knowledge >of serving military personnel being employed by a private company. >And our beloved Prime Minister has disclaimed all responsibility or >knowledge of the whole affair. Peter Reith belligerently stated: >"As far as Dubai is concerned, we didn't know about it but it >wasn't illegal and so what." > >Either we have a pack of imbeciles leading our country who don't >know what their personal staffs are up to - which must be called >gross incompetence at the least, or they are all up to their necks >in the sewerage that is now being exposed for all to see. Either >way, these people smell bad. Nothing more than a Royal commission >with wide powers of investigation and access to all relevant >cabinet documents and "secret reports" will clear the air now. >If a full public enquiry is not initiated, the smell from this >affair will linger till long after the next election. > >For full reports check out The Age online Dubai Special: ><http://www.theage.com.au/special/dubai/index.html> >The Age: Howard linked to Dubai plan: claim ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news1.html> >* The Age: "If I tell a blatant lie ... " ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news2.html> >The Age: `Special job' claim is most damning entry ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news3.html> >The Age: Ministers deny they knew of Dubai plan ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news4.html> >The Age: The 158 pages that read like a spy thriller ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news5.html> >The Age: Central role for adviser: affidavit ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news6.html> >The Age: Patrick bankrolled Dubai: documents ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news7.html> >The Age: `They shouldn't have goaded us' ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news8.html> >* The Age: A strategy doomed from the start ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news9.html> >The Age: PM's department helped to `ensure prompt issue' ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news10.html> >The Age: The offers, the denial and an angry phone call ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news11.html> >The Age: Michael Wells full affidavit ><http://www.theage.com.au/daily/980508/news/news12.html> >(See especially the asterisked articles) > >Government under attack from International Unions >The International Confederation of Free Trade Unions has lodged a >complaint with the International Labour Organisation over the >Government's handling of the waterfront dispute, alleging nine >breaches of Australia's obligations under international labour >treaties. > >The allegations include: >* failure to protect workers against discrimination based on >trade union membership; >* failure to protect the MUA from its rights to be associated >with an international trade union organisation, the International >Transport Federation. >* allegations that the MUA was not allowed to engage in >"legitimate" secondary boycott actions allowed by international >treaties in certain strikes. >* issues of Patrick's corporate restructuring, picketing and >discrimination against MUA union members in the offering of >individual contracts. > >Tim Noonan, from the ICFTU said "We see this as the most serious >attack on trade union rights that has happened in any OECD country >for some time. This is right at the top of our agenda and we know >that some governments are concerned about it." >This follows a previous criticism of the Governments Workplace >Relations Act by an ILO judicial committee. >(Source: Financial Review 8/5/98) > >---------------------------- >War on the Wharfies is an independent web page which >contains: >* News reports on the Maritime Union of Australia fight against > the rightwing attack by the National Farmers Federation, > waterfront bosses, and federal and state governments. >* News on other union actions and progressive campaigns, or the > general attack on workers rights or conditions > >Takver-AT-onaustralia.com.au > War on the Wharfies - essential links > http://www.users.bigpond.com/Takver/soapbox/index.htm > http://www.yll.org.au/mua > http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/messageboard/mbs.cgi/mb63212 >------------------------------- > --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005