Date: Sun, 17 May 1998 07:35:48 +1000 From: takver-AT-onaustralia.com.au (by way of pmargin-AT-xchange.anarki.net (Profit Margin)) Subject: AUT: LL:ART:MUA:War on the Wharfies 16 May update News Summary - Saturday 16 May War on the Wharfies Homepage: http://www.users.bigpond.com/Takver/soapbox/index.htm CONTENTS (16/5/98) Prime Minister shown as top man in waterfront strategy (16/5/98) Justice Beach exacts vengeance on MUA (16/5/98) COMMENT - Waterfront Politics - Indonesia erupts against Suharto New Sub-pages : French language article on the sackings Indonesian News and Links page ----------------------------------- News Summary - Saturday 16 May Prime Minister shown as top man in waterfront strategy The Prime Minister, "Honest" John Howard, featured at the top of a flow chart on the reporting strategy for waterfront reform. This document and other information from two secret reports commissioned by the Government were released on Friday by the Financial Review. The documents are from reports prepared by Dr Stephen Webster and David Trebeck. They name, not only the Prime Minister, but also senior departmental heads and advisors. Dr Webster, a former naval historian, is now a senior advisor to Peter Reith, Minister for Industrial Confrontation. Both reports detailed the need to provoke industrial unrest on the waterfront for a major strike so that a non-union workforce could be established on the docks. The ACTU is seeking to subpoena these reports for the Conspiracy case against Reith, Patrick and the National Farmers Federation. Similarly, the Senate, the Federal Upper House of Parliament, has voted for the reports to be tabled by the Government. The Government is refusing. The Prime Minister is featured at the top of the chart, followed by the Ministers for Transport(John Sharp) and Industrial Relations(Peter Reith). Then the ministerial advisors which includes Prime Ministerial advisor Arthur Sinodinos; Greg Bondar, former Executive director of the Australian Chamber of Shipping and Advisor to Transport Minister John Sharp; and Wilson as advisor to Workplace Relations Minister Peter Reith. Next follow the departmental secretaries - Moore-Wilton from Prime Minister and Cabinet, Allan Hawke from Transport, and David Rosalky from Workplace Relations. After that come the special advisors and secretariat as part of the Waterfront Taskforce, which would include Trebeck and Webster. The first report by ACIL was at a cost of $60,000 in May 1996. The report had to wait until the Government's anti-union legislation was in place in early 1997 - the Workplace Relations Act. The contents of the ACIL report were described to the AFR by those familiar with its contents as "explosive". The key points of the report were: * How to keep the ports moving in a dispute. * How to rehire labour in an all-out stoppage. * The importance of stressing the multi-dimensional aspects of the waterfront monopoly problems, including stevedores, port authorities, tugs and ancillary services. * The legal aspects, particularly relating to secondary boycotts and picketing. * How to highlight the question of waterfront inefficiencies and problems caused by the Maritime Union of Australia. ACIL prepared a second report without the necessity for the tendering process, citing a need for "special knowledge and familiarity with the previous task" and "the need for sensitive handling of this task requires a strict 'need to know' approach and this adds to the requirement that the work be carried through by ACIL Economics and Policy Pty Ltd." The consultants contracts stipulated a clause requiring anyone working on the reports to sign copies of the section of the Crimes Act dealing with official secrets. A futher report in Saturdays paper suggests that P&O Ports were also at one stage considering dismissal of its workforce if a national strike eventuated over the sale of the Australian National Line, owned by the Australian Government. This report is based upon handwritten notes by Peter Reith recording a conversation with then Transport Minister John Sharp on March 20 1996. A confidential briefing paper prepared for Peter Reith, John Sharp, Patrick and P&O Ports last March (1997) was titled "Summary Dismissal of Federal Award Employees Engaged in Unprotected Industrial Action". This paper details strategies for dismissal of the workforce, and some of the pitfalls to avoid. In one part it suggests alternative restructuring options and states: "One possibility would be to outsource the running of operations, with responsibility for operations being contracted out. Another would be for the stevedore to engage a labour agency which provided workers on an 'as required basis', without a direct legal relationship ever existing between the stevedore and the worker." (Financial Review 15/5/98, 16/5/98) Justice Beach exacts vengeance on MUA You may recall that Victorian Supreme Court Justice Beach, when approached by Patricks on Monday 20th April, granted an injunction against any members of the public of being anywhere near Patrick's Melbourne terminals. The order was so broad it made a mockery of the law. A court of appeal successfully overturned the severity of such a ridiculus order and ruled it only applied to MUA members. Justice Beach had ordered that the MUA place quarter page adds in 3 newspapers advising the public of the injunction. These adds did not appear until last week, at least two weeks after the injunction. The "good" judge found the MUA to be in contempt of court, and is hearing arguments on penalties. A possible precedent on penalties could arise from the Mudginberri dispute in 1985 when the meat workers' union was fined $10,000 plus $2,000 a day for contempt of a Federal Court interim injunction. Justice Beach, I heard about your injunction, and then happily went down to the picket line as a member of the community to support workers who were trying to uphold Justice North's original order for reinstatement made on the 8th April. People were gathered at the community assembly to support justice for workers, if necessary with nonviolent civil disobedience. Patrick Stevedoring were openly flouting Justice North's injunction. Maritime Union submits claims for Patrick Appeal delays On Thursday the MUA formally demanded that Patrick pay around $1.6 million for the wages lost by its members because of the two-week delay in implementing Federal Court reinstatement orders while the company pursued appeals all the way to the High Court.Undertakings were given by Patrick to the full Federal Court and the High Court that it would meet any damage suffered by the MUA as a result of the original orders being stayed pending the outcomes of the appeal. In other moves, the Maritime union is seeking control of the creditors committee of the labour companies. To do this, the union will be lodging a $400 million damages claim against Patrick in the near future. If the labour companies are liquidated, the labour contacts can be put out to tender. Similarly, the administrators have the power to outsource the labour. There are at least four contract labour companies interested in suppling labour including: Skilled Engineering, Manpower Australia, the National Farmers Federation backed Producers and Consumers Stevedores. On the International Picket Line 16 May In Osaka on 11 May, hundreds of demonstrating Japanese trade unionists met the Australian Endeavour to protest about the use of non-union stevedoring labour to work the ship in Australia. Similar gatherings took place in Yokohama on 8 May and 10 May in Nagoya. The MSC Singapore was also met by Japanese dockers in Yokohama. No further news on the fugitive vessel Colombus Canada which was last reported at anchor off Los Angeles unable to unload is cargo. The CGM Gauguin was diverted from Bombay last week after ITF affiliated dockers unions there warned the vessel would be targeted. The vessel was worked by Indonesion dockers under protest who said the ship was badly stowed and unsafe. ITF Press release 12 May News Comment - Saturday 16 May Waterfront Politics - Indonesia erupts against Suharto COMFORTABLE AND RELAXED John Howard, Australia's relaxed and comfortable Prime Minister and Peter Reith, the Federal Minister for workplace warfare have miscalculated badly in their attempts to introduce non-union labour on the wharves. In one of the most amateurish political displays since Federation, they have managed to set the cat among the contract pigeons. Alarm bells began ringing even among diehard coalition supporters when Australians began to understand the ramifications of Patrick's legal pirouettes. One hundred thousand workers marched in Melbourne last week because they understood that employers, both in the private and public sector, could legally establish insolvent companies that could be sent down to the bottom of the harbour anytime the parent company found it convenient to do so. Contract workers and workers who have signed Enterprise Bargaining Agreements realised that their contracts are not worth the paper they are written on. Today almost every worker both in the unionised and non-unionised workforce doesn't share the Prime Minister's comfortable and relaxed position. Everyone now understands that any employer, can at any time, legally structure their business so that they can circumvent laws that have been passed by parliament to safeguard peoples' job security and in the bargain not pay workers back pay and entitlements when they are sacked. If John Howard had even the slightest intention of keeping his election promise of using his extraordinary parliamentary majority to create a relaxed and comfortable society, he would make it his governments priority to introduce urgent legislation into parliament to prevent the Patrick's fiasco from occurring again. Examining John Howard's past parliamentary record, the chances his government will pass legislation to improve workers security is tantamount to asking Dracula to give back the blood he's stolen from his victims. Suharto the Butcher must go A PERMANENT HOLIDAY FOR MR. TEN PERCENT Contrary to all expectations, student protests in Indonesia have increased in the face of severe government clampdown. The conditions attached to the Indonesian International Monetary Fund bailout have signalled the beginning of the end for Suharto, the father of half a million dead. As Suharto takes his place in a developing nation's conference in Egypt, students are spearheading the resistance against Suharto the Butcher and the International Monetary Fund. Suharto the Butcher, the regions if not the worlds foremost exponent of crony capitalism (what belongs to the state is mine) is facing the first serious challenge to his rule in over thirty years. The rest of the country waits in the wings while Indonesian students take on the military machine. To date the reaction to Suharto's rule has been confined to student circles, in the last twenty four hours prominent Muslim opposition leaders have publicly articulated their opposition to Suharto and have demanded his resignation. Although most Indonesians are not involved in overt resistance to the Suharto military machine, it's possible, just possible that the military will be unable or more likely unwilling to stop students challenging the legitimacy of the Indonesian military dictatorship. Suharto has become an embarrassment not only to his people, but the International Monetary Fund and world leaders including Bill Clinton. The stage is set for the overthrow of the Suharto regime and the possible disintegration of the Indonesian state, an artificial colonial entity. Whether the I.M.F. and regional governments, including Australia and the United States are able to replace the Suharto regime with a government that's friendly to their objectives and the I.M.F.'s objectives is difficult to say. Whether the student revolt is embraced by the Indoenesian people and establish as a government that caters to their needs, not the needs of the corporate world, will depend on how far the revolt will spread. Either way Suharto the Butcher's days are numbered. JOSEPH TOSCANO (Libertarian Workers for a Self-Managed Society). Anarchist Age Weekly Review Number 299 11th - 17th May, 1998. http://avoca.vicnet.net.au/~anarchist/weekly.html Quote of the week 'I defy anybody to go and get passports for 76 current and ex-serving soldiers to go to Dubai next week and not have Foreign Affairs and ASIO all over them.' Andrew Harris, quoted in SMH, 9 May 1998 http://www.smh.com.au/daily/content/980509/pageone/pageone5.html ---------------------------- War on the Wharfies is an independent web page which contains: * News reports on the Maritime Union of Australia fight against the rightwing attack by the National Farmers Federation, waterfront bosses, and federal and state governments. * News on other union actions and progressive campaigns, or the general attack on workers rights or conditions Takver-AT-onaustralia.com.au War on the Wharfies - essential links http://www.users.bigpond.com/Takver/soapbox/index.htm http://www.yll.org.au/mua http://www.InsideTheWeb.com/messageboard/mbs.cgi/mb63212 ------------------------------- --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005