Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 14:36:29 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: AUT: Grundrisse/MBM On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Profit Margin wrote: > > >Well ... but the converse could be said as well. I.e. (many) working class > >actions can be understood as responses/reflexes to initiatives undertaken > >by the capitalist class. Don't you agree? > > Yes, I do, Jerry. It's the notion of the working class as "prime mover" or > "original cause" (a la Tronti in "Lenin in England") which I have doubts > about, and am hoping to provoke some discussion of. But maybe I'm jumping > the gun, and should wait to see how that arises within a specific > discussion of MBM. Steve/Jerry: We can look at MBM, but we can also remember the treatment in CAPITAL and elsewhere that privileges "living labor" over "dead labor". It is at this level that I think the "prime mover" argument is rooted. Capitalism is viewed less as a selfpropelled jauggernaut than as a constraint on worker/human development. Not only is dead-labor/capital-as-means-of-production used to control workers but more generally their creativity and imagination, their "becoming" is limited by the imposed requirements to work and to constrain social activity within the capitalist framework of forms, e.g., the circuits, profit maximization, etc. This perspective makes perfectly good sense to me, once we recognize that the subsumption of living labor also involves the subsumption or instrumentalization of a certain amount of human imagination and creativity to the preservation of capital, i.e., virtually the entirety of the economics profession. > > Mind you, I think the particular spin that Werner Bonefeld and John > Holloway put on this question, in terms of "the insubordination of labour" > (I think that's their phrase) is useful . . . > Steve/Jerry: Sometimes the phrase is nicely evocative; but on the otherhand it retains 1) the view of working class subjectivity as that of "labor" which is too restrictive in my view and 2) still rings a bit of "reaction" and not initiative. > >Indeed, if we are to examine on a case-by-case basis the > >working-class "initiatives" in the last decade, we can see that many of > >those "initiatives" are "defensive" in nature. E.g. the > >responses to the "concessions movement" of the 1980's and the struggle > >internationally against neo-liberal austerity policies in the 1990's. > > Some case-by-case accounts would be more than useful, if anyone cares to > have a stab at it. The Hormel dispute in particular seemed to have many > lessons in it - Peter Rachleff for one wrote a fine book about it, after > having participated in the Twin Cities support group . . . > > Steve > Steve: If you look at the writings of those in the "autonomist" tradition over the last twenty years, I think you find plenty of evidence of recognition that these have been years of capitalist counterattack and efforts to craft adequate responses to workers previous struggles. Look at the material in Zerowork or Midnight Notes, or in Futur Anterieur. What differentiates the latter from the former, however, is the more focused effort to understand the emerging (working class) subjectivity that capital is trying to reorganize around to hang on to its ability to command society. Thus all the discussion of immaterial labor, the socialized worker, etc. The problem is not that the dialectic still has life, but to snuff it out and liberate the subjectivities struggling for the freedom of self-elaboration. Harry ............................................................................ Harry Cleaver Department of Economics University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712-1173 USA Phone Numbers: (hm) (512) 478-8427 (off) (512) 475-8535 Fax:(512) 471-3510 E-mail: hmcleave-AT-eco.utexas.edu Cleaver homepage: http://www.eco.utexas.edu/faculty/Cleaver/index.html Chiapas95 homepage: http://www.eco.utexas.edu/faculty/Cleaver/chiapas95.html Accion Zapatista homepage: http://www.utexas.edu/students/nave/ ............................................................................ --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005