From: "Per-Anders Svärd" <per-anders.svard-AT-telia.com>
Subject: AUT: RE: Democratic centralism
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:18:30 +0200


Hi!

I think we all can agree that the concept of "democratic centralism" is a notoriously vague one, and that, historically, it has been used by various leninist groups to meet very reactionary and oppressive ends. Therefore it would be interesting to hear exactly what George refers to when he says that "the principle of DC is a correct one".

Regarding the role of the rev. party/organisation (as concieved by you, George)  - should it, for instance, participate in national elections and other State activities? 

In solidarity,
Per-Anders Svärd
(Stockholm, Sweden)



-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: George Pennefather <poseidon-AT-eircom.net>
Till: aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu <aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
Datum: den 6 juli 2000 08:07
Ämne: Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers


>Sean: i'm more interested in mass mobilizations of people interested in
>radical change. I don't think a Leninist revolution is the worst thing that
>could happen, necessarily, but we have witnessed many negative examples.
>
>George: Mass mobilisations of people interested in radical change is a vague
>and unprogrammatic formulation. Mass mobilisations, to be revolutionary,
>must advance slogans and demands. It is not enought to be merely
>interested --a rather passive state. Right wing people may mass mobilise
>because they are interested in radical change --interested in opposing it.
>
>Comradely regards
>George
>
>Be free to check out our Communist Think-Tank web site at
>http://homepage.eircom.net/~beprepared/
>
>Subscribe to Revcommy Mailing Community at
>rev-commies-subscribe-AT-eGroups.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---



     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---