Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 10:21:48 +0100 From: "steve.devos" <steve.devos-AT-krokodile.com> Subject: Re: AUT: Neo-conservatism and workers Sean I read him as a traditional CP member - i thought they had gone the way of the dinosaurs.... still in the spirit of solidarity. sdv Sean Fenley wrote: > is this guy posting to the right list? > -Sean > > --- George Pennefather <poseidon-AT-eircom.net> wrote: > > > > The Canadian Alliance is a right wing party that is > > growing in popularity > > apparently because its programme includes tax > > cutting policies by way of > > reducing the state budget deficit. Clearly cutting > > taxes by reducing the > > budget deficit can only mean cuts in state social > > spending which reduces the > > standard of living of the working class particularly > > its lower layers. > > > > Why is it that support for such anti-working class > > policies can lead to an > > increase in electoral popularity? The Republicans in > > the U.S., the Tories > > under Thatcher and the PDs in Ireland are parties > > that have made this policy > > their clarion call. > > > > Clearly it is an indication, among other things, of > > the changes in the > > social composition of the working class over the > > years. In the West there > > has emerged a layer of comparatively highly paid > > skilled intellectual > > workers who gain almost nothing from state social > > welfare spending and yet > > pay high taxes. This layer is an upper layer within > > the working class. It > > is, in some degree, a transitional layer in the > > sense that some elements > > within it are in a fluid condition whereby there is > > a flux back and forth > > between the working and middle class. Consequently > > there obtains ambiguity > > within this layer as to its social identity --its > > definition in class terms. > > This condition provides rich fertile ground for the > > blossoming of petty > > bourgeois ideas. Much of this layer may not feel the > > need to unionise. > > Sections of it tend to the view that welfare > > spending is of no benefit to it > > while such spending is supported by their fiscal > > contributions. Their > > ideology tends to support the belief that many of > > the beneficiaries of > > state welfare don't want to work or are fraudsters > > who scam by working in > > the black economy while availing of welfare payments > > and whatever else. Many > > elements from this upper layer are very often > > involved in private health > > care systems. Consequently they have little sympathy > > for even middle ranking > > workers who may be earning a comparatively > > reasonable wage yet must avail of > > some of the state welfare benefits. > > > > These neo-liberal policies also strike a chord with > > the middle class, many > > of whom have small enterprises, who don't, in large > > part, qualify for state > > welfare. > > > > The upshot is that neo-liberal or neo-conservative > > parties draw support from > > sections of the middle class together with the upper > > stratum of the working > > class. In that sense these parties draw from a > > constituency that straddle > > two classes in addition to the bourgeoisie. In this > > way the middle class and > > a relatively privileged layer of the working class > > are particularly utilised > > by the bourgeoisie to undermine the class > > cohesiveness of the working class. > > Neo-conservatism is a clever bourgeois strategy, > > anchored in specific > > objective developments, to undermine the working > > class economically, > > politically and even ideologically. > > > > Much of this layer of the working class would have > > had its origins in the > > middle to lower strata of the working class. Due to > > the growth of the > > welfare state, in particular from the sixties > > onward, much of the offspring > > of the working class would have been able to avail > > of third level > > education --free education, college grants etc. This > > education would have > > qualified them for admission to the upper layer of > > the working class in a > > period when enormous technological changes have been > > in progress. > > Consequently this stratum has grown in size and has > > become largely more > > affluent. > > > > This element was not so prevalent in the fifties and > > sixties because the > > composition of the upper layer of the working class > > possessed a different > > character then. The upper layer, then, principally > > consisted of highly > > skilled tradesmen. Later it increasingly included > > highly skilled technicians > > and commercial workers with a residue of highly > > skilled craftsmen. Later > > again it increasingly included a technical > > intelligentsia engaged in the > > electronic and financial sectors. The growth of this > > new element of > > intellectual worker in this layer led to the > > emergence of a correspondingly > > different culture within the upper layer. They > > lacked the trade union > > culture of the proportionately diminishing > > traditional element within this > > layer. This element came from a different background > > in the sense that it > > was college based bearing the particular petty > > bourgeois culture entailed > > by college life. > > > > Consequently it did not see themselves as forming a > > cohesive layer within > > the working class. Consequently their allegiance to > > the trade union > > movement, and labour politics generally, was less > > certain. By virtue of its > > particular education and environment its conception > > of social being bore a > > more individualist or egoist character --their > > consciousness was less > > collectivist. Its education and college experience > > led them to question much > > of traditional labour politics. However this > > questioning was grounded in a > > negative reactionary perspective rather than in the > > perspective of critique. > > We see then that the very welfare state, that much > > of this layer now seek to > > have undermined, was one of the very conditions of > > its crystallisation as a > > prominent and significant section of the working > > class higher layer. It is > > this section that has been the decisive condition > > in facilitating the > > destruction of the cohesiveness of the working class > > by the bourgeoisie. > > > > Much of this layer likes to think of itself as good > > as the bourgeoisie. It > > likes to think of itself as cool, cultured and > > "where its at". It likes to > > imagine --hence the significance of "the imaginary" > > in this ideology that > > envelops them-- that there is some assumed guarantee > > that things can never > > be as they were in the "bad" past. It never even > > considers that living > > standards, rights etc can be invaded by the > > bourgeoisie or that if they are > > it will not be adversely affected. It imagines that > > there is some natural > > scheme of things that guarantees that today will > > always be so --and even get > > better. For it fiction is reality and reality is > > fiction. This is tantamount > > to blissful superstition --a new religion, a new > > ignorance, the post-modern. > > It entertains a superstitious belief in capitalism. > > Even when it shows an > > interest in radical ideas it does so in a way that > > lacks any sense of > > urgency --any urgent sense of the need for real > > change. Radical ideas are a > > form of entertainment --literature and hence the > > growing significance of > > literary criticism as a cannibalistic ideology that > > has been increasingly > > dominating much of the universities. > > > > This layer emerges from an entirely new objective > > conditions entailing a > > "new" culture and mindset. It did not directly > > crystallise out of the > > working class and trade union movement. Instead it > > is a product of the > > schools and colleges --the ideological apparatus of > > the capitalist state. > > > > The emergence of neo-conservatism as a populist form > > is an acute reflection > > of the failure of the working class movement to win > > this section of the > > working class over to the side of labour. It is a > > reflection > === message truncated ==> > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. > http://invites.yahoo.com/ > > --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005