From: "Karl Carlile" <dagda-AT-eircom.net> Subject: AUT: Islamic fundamentalism Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:28:14 +0100 Over the last twenty or more years Islamic fundamentalism has emerged as a considerable political force culminating in its taking power in Iran and other countries. This resurgence of Islamic fundamentalism is a product of the failure of a revolutionary communist leadership to develop. It is also a product of the role played by the reactionary leaderships of the working class such as Stalinism and reformism etc. Islamic fundamentalism is a reactionary politics designed to contain the masses. It has tended to emerge when the masses are mounting a spontaneous offensive against imperialism as in Iran. Iran is the classical example for understanding the role played by Islamic fundamentalism. The masses mounted a spontaneous insurrection against the Shah who was an imperialist satrap. In the course of the insurrection Islamic fundamentalism with the help of Stalinism was able to step into the leadership of the rising and hijack the upsurge. It was able to do this partly because of its belligerently demagogic anti-imperialism. The reason it was able to do this is because the masses had become increasingly disillusioned by Stalinism and reformism because of their failure to provide solutions. They consequently saw it as constituting a form of collaboration with imperialism by the betrayals of the masses that it had perpetrated. The false lesson that the masses drew from this was that there must be an abandonment of all western ideologies and politics because they all collaborated with imperialism ultimately. The problem was changed from one of simple anti-imperialism to one of anti-westernism. Imperialism was viewed as much more expansive to include all things related to western society. In this way Islamic fundamentalism was able to keep the masses away from genuinely subversive western ideas and politics by promoting the insulation of the masses from the west. By promoting anti-westernism in the guise of being anti-imperialist Islamic fundamentalism had devised a useful strategy for reinforcing its leadership and reducing the threat from revolutionary politics that had their roots in the West. This seriously contained the thinking, politics and culture of the Iranian masses and guaranteed their support for fundamentalism. Had fundamentalism merely confined its attack to imperialism itself the masses would have been prepared to examine other forms of western culture which would have weakened the hold of fundamentalism on them since they might have been influenced by these ideas. As a result of this the Iranian regime supported the development of native capitalism to the exclusion of foreign imperialist capital. As a result of this the country sank progressively into backwardness. The constraining of capitalism to its indigenous form led to the further creation of the objective economic conditions that corresponded with its anti-westernism and the politics of fundamentalism. The Iranian bourgeoisie reluctantly supported Muslim fundamentalism because it was an acute albeit distorted expression of its existence as an indigenous class. The bourgeoisie had were threatened by the revolutionary condition of the insurrection of the Iranian masses. The only way in which it could be contained was by Islamic fundamentalism. Consequently it reluctantly supported it. Sections of this class were unhappy with the fact that their class interests were being undermined by imperialist economic penetration and felt an Islamic state would better serve its interests. The fact that the bourgeois revolution in Iran took the peculiar form of the establishment of an Islamic state is evidence of the weakness of the native bourgeoisie and its inability to promote its interests politically in a more direct way. Its weakness in the face of the masses and of foreign monopoly capital made this the only way forward --a very reactionary way. In this way the Iranian bourgeoisie played a very reactionary role in keeping down the masses. The existence of large oil supplies in Iran assisted the bourgeoisie in its ability to proceed down the road of quasi-autarchy. Without the existence an Islamic bourgeois regime would have been unthinkable. The Islamic state suited the class interests of the Iranian bourgeoisie fine since it was a very oppressive regime. Using religion it was able to effectively implement the savagely oppressive measures to contain the masses. It suppressed all left opposition in the name of Allah. It introduced all kinds of oppressive measure to restrict the freedom of workers and peasants --particularly female workers and peasants. By suppressing all non Islamic thought and all dissenting politics or culture it was able to snuff any last remains of rebelliousness amongst the masses. By encouraging rabid anti-Americanism and anti-westernism it was able to distract attention away from the enemy at home and cause this revolutionary energy to exhaust itself in anti-western stuff while making the masses think it was being subversive. Now that the Islamic regime has effectively done its job at defeating the masses the Iranian bourgeoisie wants to get rid of this regime. The masses are no longer a threat. The reform movement is an expression of the abandonment by the bourgeoisie of the regime. Also it the reform movement is the bourgeoisie's way of containing in a new form the rising disillusionment and discontent among the masses with the Islamic regime. Now the Iranian bourgeoisie want to form an alliance with imperialism to keep the masses in its place and develop itself economically. The Iranian economy is in a bad way which is not so good for its bourgeoisie. The Iranian bourgeoisie are abandoning the Islamic fundamentalist for several reasons: The economy is in a mess. The masses had been defeated. To pre-empt any future rising against the Islamic regime by the masses and against the bourgeoisie. Regards Karl Carlile Visit our Communist Think-Tank Web Site at: http://homepage.eircom.net/~beprepared/ Join our Communist Think-Tank Mailing Community at: mailto:rev-commies-subscribe-AT-eGroups.com --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005