Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 20:25:50 -0700 Subject: Re: AUT: Re: wheee... nationalism ... From: Sharon Vance <canito3-AT-earthlink.net> I think in our analysis we have to constantly go back and forth between looking at what is, and trying to figure out why it is, and what we think ought to be, but we need to not confuse the two types of analyses. A lot of us think that nationalism is back, some of think that certain parts of it are bad -- that is probably closer to my stand, actually. But we can not deny that among both groups who belong to the dominant category and those who belong to the subordinate category nationalism is strong, in many cases stronger than class consciousness. For me the crucial question is, why? I think there are a number of reasons. Some are institutional and practical. How many class based organizations are there in any given society? Isn't class consciousness not suppressed in one form or another in almost all capitalist societies. The US is a perfect example. But race, religion and ethnic identities are often accepted and encouraged, as long as they don't upset the status quo. If you go into any working class neighborhood, except for the local bar (which is still often gender segregated), how many working places and meeting halls are there? How many churches are there? People are simply not given any incentive to identify as working class, and every incentive to NOT identify as such. This is also true in countries like Morocco, which are even more economically divided, and have an even greater % of the population on the bottom. I'm not saying that people can not overcome these obstacles, and some people are. But what would it take for most people to do so? Sharon --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005