Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:50:16 +0000 (GMT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Scott=20Hamilton?= <s_h_hamilton-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: Re: AUT: Perplexing Peter Peter wrote: Scott you correctly say that I have no idea how > to put my politics into > practice...I could choose to take > part in mainly Leninist campaign groups > recognising the futility of such > efforts I prefer to spend my time Trotbaiting and > getting punched in the > head by my kung-fu mates. You shouldn't tell me Peter - you should explain yourself instead to the people who are actually living with the consequences of imperialism, eg the sort of immigrant communities - Pakistani, Nepalese, Afghan - that the AIC has been dealing with. Tell the Somali refugees who are getting beaten up by thugs mobilised after S 11 that you have better things to do, until the great proletarian revolt kicks off. Tell my Iraqi friend who has lost half his extended family due to imperialism that you don't want to do anything right now for fear of being contaminated by Bolshevism. I think you'd soon be needing all your kung fu skills, if you attempted such explanations... When Peter talks of 'futility of Leninist campaign groups', he is talking about the efforts of the Anti-Imperialist Coalition, the Auckland grouping set up after S 11. I belong to the AIC and promote it and the whole anti-imperialist wing of the anti-war movement on this list, and Peter doesn't like that. Of course, this is his right. Does he have the right, though, to liken the results achieved by the AIC and similar groups to the results of his own peculiar supermilitant quietism? Peter should have a look at the real achievements of the anti-imperialist section of the anti-war movement in NZ and around the world, before he claims that we're all engaged in a 'futile' exercise. In NZ, we have not created anything like a mass proletarian movement of the kind Peter waits for passively, but we have nevertheless notched up some very worthwhile achievements, for instance: We have been a driving force behind protests of up to 800 people, and two national days of action. Do you call that 'futile', Peter? We have won a number of mass trade unions over to an anti-war position. Do you call that 'futile', Peter? We have relentlessly harrassed the 'centre-left' government, picketing their party conferences and their MPs' offices, homes, and public appearances, and exposing them to the public with anti-war propaganda. We can claim some credit, perhaps, for the fact that the junior, 'left' party in the government has collapsed under the weight of its leadership's support for the war. Do you call that 'futile', Peter? We in the AIC, an Auckland-only group of only about 15 hardcore members, raised about $700 for the Afghan Workers Solidarity Campaign, an international exercise in humanitarian aid that exhibits all the hallmarks of the 'workers' self-organisation' and 'autonomy' that Peter likes to rave on. Do you call that 'futile', Peter? When the government locked up a number of Afghan refugees illegally, we helped raise the alarm and picket the courts until the government released them. Do you call that 'futile', Peter? We have kicked off a campaign against a repressive new 'anti-Terrorist' Bill, holding meetings and distributing leaflets in an effort to inform a largely oblivious public of the dangers to its civil liberties. Do you call that 'futile', Peter? The AIC is the only political group in the country that has tried to raise awareness of and solidarity for the revolution in Argentina, holding a picket, a street meeting, and a public talk and distributing hundreds of copies of a leaflet. Do you call that 'futile', Peter? The AIC is the first group in the country to highlight the danger of a new war on Iraq; we are trying to lay the foundations for a mass protest movement against such a war with our propaganda. Do you call that 'futile', Peter? I don't mean to show off with the above examples: I'm aware that our efforts pale into insignificance in comparison with those in other, larger countries with a more insurgent populace. It must also be noted that the efforts of the liberal/social democratic wing of the anti-war movement have produced some very worthwhile results - the recent 20,000-strong 'No War on Iraq' march in London, for instance. Even contextualised, though, the efforts of NZ's anti-imperialist anti-war movement deserve more than the contempt Peter offers. Peter might argue that the political positions staked out by outfits like the AIC are out-and-out reactionary, and doom any practical activism to futility or worse. Such an argument can be tested by an examination of the literature that the AIC has produced, much of which is online at http://www.geocities.com/anti_imperialist_coalition/leaflets.htm Curiously enough, there is much here that autopsy members would agree wholeheartedly with; indeed, one or two autopsy members' posts live on in the leaflet on open borders. It's also curious that a number of the leaflets have been taken up by avowed anti-Leninists: the full text of the leaflet on Argentina, for instance, turned up on -AT-infos, the international anarchist news service, and in the last issue of thr-AT-ll, NZ's anarchist paper. It might also be instructive to look at the archives of the e mail list set up by AIC member shortly after S 11 to aid the coordination of the activities of the radical, anti-cap, anti-imp wing of the anti-war movement (check it out at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiwar_anticap_nz/ - you'd have to join to read the archives). This list has become the venue for a rich and intense debate about the way forward for far left in NZ, a debate which is focused and disciplined by the unity which common action has brought to a significant section of the far left here. Perhaps Peter has a retraction to make? Cheers Scott ===="Revolution is not like cricket, not even one day cricket" __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005