From: "Nate Holdren" <nateholdren-AT-hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: AUT: What could "proletarian socialism" possibly mean?
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 15:13:21 -0500


Nico-
I'm not familiar with Seidamn. can you point me toward any english language 
resources, I'm very interested in what you have to say about the spanish 
revolution
Nate

>
>The contradiction seems clear in a communisation point aof view :   the
>communist movement abolishes classes,  proletariat abolish itself
>(autonegation), as the class of work in the capital contradiction. Only
>proletariat can lead communist movement, but the realization is
>self-dissolution of proletariat as a separate class in society. That's why
>antiwork movement (refusal of work) is so important to understand
>correctly -- as long as organized worker movement will identify itself to
>work, it will stay inside the capital contradiction and, in revolutionnary
>times, become fetishied work against workers. Seidamn (Workers against 
>work)
>explain this well about spanish revolution.
>
>For french readers, the review Theorie Communiste explain it as well -- in 
>a
>sometime unreadable way. Also Gilles Dauv  "les rvolutionnaires ont iols
>une contre-rvolution de retard ?".
>
>Nico
>
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---



_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx



     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---