From: "cwright" <cwright-AT-21stcentury.net>
Subject: Re: Re: AUT: Re: RE: Zizek
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 12:05:49 -0600


anna,

Sorry for the delay.  I suspect this has to do with immanence, but could you
develop this a bit?  The references do not make it clearer.

Cheers,
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: <ephemeralskin-AT-netscape.net>
To: <aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: Re: AUT: Re: RE: Zizek


> hi. first ever post...
>
> cwright <cwright-AT-21stcentury.net> wrote:
>
> >possibility, as ek-static (possibly but not yet existing, according to
Ernst
> >Bloch)
>
> deleuze/bergson argue that "the possible" is a mental trick, an inadequate
concept. deleuze has revised marx with the bergsonian concepts of
virtual/actual and a critique of kant to generate a "transcendental
empiricism".
> -anna lingus.
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________
> Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas.
Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop-AT-Netscape!
http://shopnow.netscape.com/
>
> Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com/
>
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>



     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---