Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:51:51 +0100 (BST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Scott=20Hamilton?= <s_h_hamilton-AT-yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: AUT: Difference of Concept: Empire & Imperialism


 
Michael Hardt wrote:

It is a decentered and deterritorializing
> apparatus of rule that progressively incorporates
> the
> entire global realm within its open, expanding
> frontiers....

Yet the attention of the world has been focused, over
the past few months, on a couple of buildings in a
single city in a single country, the United States,
where a handful of people are making decisions which
will have more influence, in the short term at least,
over the future than the actions of billions of other
inhabitants of the globe. The decision to attack is
not being made in Jakarta or Warsaw or even London,
but in Washington DC. In what sense, then, are we
seeing a 'decentred apparatus of rule'? In no sense at
all, I would suggest. The apparatus of rule is no more
being decentred than the nation state called the US is
fading away.

Cheers
Scott





===="Revolution is not like cricket, not even one day cricket"

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com


     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---