Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:07:45 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Thomas=20Seay?= <entheogens-AT-yahoo.com> Subject: Re: AUT: Fwd: Amiri Baraka poem Sean, Please dont think that my criticism was meant for you. As is said, you were just the messenger. I am not an expert on poetry either, though I enjoy it occasionaly. I do think sound is more important in poetry than in other forms, hence the use of meter, etc. So, it is difficult for any poem to fully come to life as long as it is not recited. My criterion for good art is that it shake me up to see something for the first time or in a new way. Barakas poem neither appeals to my senses through..this Baraka poem is the opposite of that. It repeats platitudes that actually can desensitize you. I am not stuck on amy particular style but, in addition to empty content, Baraka does not here make use of any traditional or new devices to bring this poem to life...outside of a few abritrary couplets and repeating "Who is" on every line. This poem, as far as I can see, should be thrown in the trash can reserved for "socialist realism" mummbling. Thomas --- asc <satellitecrash-AT-yahoo.com> a écrit : > Thomas and autopsy, > I claim ignorance on poetry, i have no idea what > makes > a good poem... ====Unlike its unruly city counterpart, the suburban body has been wholly domesticated and one can say that the suburbs consitute a huge petting zoo, with the residents' bodies providing the stock of furry mammals. -JG Ballard "Project for a Glossary of the Twentieth Century" ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse -AT-yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005