From: Montyneill-AT-aol.com Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:13:50 EST Subject: Re: AUT: Re: Russia without the Bolsheviks??? --part1_cb.2b54c035.2b09284e_boundary In a message dated 11/9/2002 2:31:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, haraldba-AT-online.no writes: > Had > one taken such experiences as a point of departure, > the co-operatives that actually existed, and that > were functioning, if not perfect, tried generalizing > them and organising them better, taken a minimum > of consideration to "peasant mentality" and their > natural resentment to a policy of The Lord Gives -- the > promises of the revolution -- the Lord Takes [the > return of the Tsar dressed in leather caps and > armed], done something to avoid that tonns of food > was rottening at central ware-houses, taking intiatives > to produce things peasants actually needed or > wanted etc. rather than giving the empty promises > at gunpoint ... etc., then... All this of course demanded > that power and organisational efforts was brought > down to where most of the first-hand knowledge existed. > I largely agree with your short statement, Harald. The question that emerges from your text I block above is: who is the <one> to do these many necessary things? You note there are examples of activity "from below" - but rather evidently, no where near enough, not generalized or networked or organized sufficiently either. Something similar in terms of questions to be answered (what <ones>?) albeit in many, many very different particulars, is emerging in Argentina, I think. To link to that thread, Scott suggests there could be need for a repressive apparatus (sad but most likely true) that he says should be democratically controlled (indeed) - but, how? I have not even a suggestion of an answer beyond the abstract and the formal - real answers require real concrete knowledge and willingness to investigate and think (the argentina solidarity list serv noted a few days ago seems dominated by folks who lack one, the other or both requirements). Monty --part1_cb.2b54c035.2b09284e_boundary
HTML VERSION:
Had
one taken such experiences as a point of departure,
the co-operatives that actually existed, and that
were functioning, if not perfect, tried generalizing
them and organising them better, taken a minimum
of consideration to "peasant mentality" and their
natural resentment to a policy of The Lord Gives -- the
promises of the revolution -- the Lord Takes [the
return of the Tsar dressed in leather caps and
armed], done something to avoid that tonns of food
was rottening at central ware-houses, taking intiatives
to produce things peasants actually needed or
wanted etc. rather than giving the empty promises
at gunpoint ... etc., then... All this of course demanded
that power and organisational efforts was brought
down to where most of the first-hand knowledge existed.
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005