File spoon-archives/aut-op-sy.archive/aut-op-sy_2003/aut-op-sy.0302, message 296


Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:42:32 -0800
From: Tom Messmer <messmer-AT-endpage.com>
Subject: Re: AUT: ParEcon


Boring to who? Boring could mean "I don't want to bother understanding 
this" or "I'd rather be out smashing Starbucks windows" or "Whoa man, 
I'm more into Yoga right now, man". Personally, I THINK I know what he 
meant by this statement, but it's so imprecise that who knows? Thinking 
about theory seems really boring to most people period, so whats that 
all about? Does it mean we should drop all theory and make art or 
bombs, or hang around working class  bars and talk about football?

> 
> As for the "boring" comment, I am all for the use of the term boring as
> a sufficient condmenation, in the sense that the SI said "Boredom is
> counterrevolutionary."  I was very tickled when Harald said that and its
> a good point.


     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005