Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:42:32 -0800 From: Tom Messmer <messmer-AT-endpage.com> Subject: Re: AUT: ParEcon Boring to who? Boring could mean "I don't want to bother understanding this" or "I'd rather be out smashing Starbucks windows" or "Whoa man, I'm more into Yoga right now, man". Personally, I THINK I know what he meant by this statement, but it's so imprecise that who knows? Thinking about theory seems really boring to most people period, so whats that all about? Does it mean we should drop all theory and make art or bombs, or hang around working class bars and talk about football? > > As for the "boring" comment, I am all for the use of the term boring as > a sufficient condmenation, in the sense that the SI said "Boredom is > counterrevolutionary." I was very tickled when Harald said that and its > a good point. --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005