Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:05:28 +0100 From: Laura Fiocco <fiocco-AT-unical.it> Subject: Re: AUT: Remove Scott from this list! Harald, just don't read his messages. It's what I did as soon as I realized I couldn't stand it. ciao laura At 16.01 12/02/2003 +0100, you wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Scott Hamilton" <s_h_hamilton-AT-yahoo.com> >To: <aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu> >Sent: 12. februar 2003 13.33 >Subject: AUT: IWW, WW1, WoT > > > >Remove Scott from this list! >Communists/anarchist have nothing in common with Stalinist! > >To Scott's particular Stalinist blend of pro-capitalist, >pro-fascist policies and systematic dishonesty. > >"Nowhere do they talk about the workers of the Third >World and especially Iraq overthrowing the likes of Saddam >on their own (albeit initially in a military bloc to >repel invasion with the anti-imperialist parts of >their own bourgeoisie). They don't call for the >defence of Iraq, though that was probably too much to >ask. " > >"In the meantime, demanding that Third World states get >rid of their tiny stockpiles for self-defence is reactionary >in the extreme." > >"Does the IWW know about the thwarted workers revolution >in Iraq in 1991?" > >As Scott well know, whatever the faults of IWW, they do >support a general strike against war, workers uprising in >Iraq and elsewhere, even if not mentioned in each and >every resolution. Of course in Scott's absurd world >all that counts are the sectarian paper wars of die-hard >advocates of state capitalism.. > >As is clear from the above and everybody who have >followed Scotts consistent advocacy of class >collaboration -- including with Nazis -- on this list, Scott >supports workers serving as cannon fodder in capitalist >wars, so as to defend "their" capitalist regimes. The Iraqi >workers in 1991 were not as stupid to follow Scott's >absurd advice to defend capitalism and their butchers >in the Bath regime. They deserted and turned their >weapons the other way as soon as they got a change. > >The refer to "anti-imperialist parts of their own bourgeoisie" >in regards to imperialist Bathist Iraq is even more absurd >than usual, but not surprising coming from a Stalinist position. >(That he calls it Trotskyism does not change the substance.) > >What Scott is doing on list supposed to promote >working class self-emancipation -- and not state >capitalism and Stalinist policies -- is beyond me. > >If Scott is not removed from this list I will remove >myself. I will no longer be part of giving his particular >form of antihuman and anti-working class policies >legitimacy. > He is *consciously,* *systematically* and >*manipulatively* changing the whole character of this list >following an old and tried Stalinist tradition. > Somewhere a line has to be drawn! > Communists/anarchists have nothing in common with Stalinist! > >Harald > > > > > > > > > --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005