From: Newdem-AT-aol.com Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 11:01:43 EST Subject: AUT: autoworkers on MassRefusal Hi-- My three-monnth old Dell computer has been dead since Monday afternoon, so I've been hors de combat. I've got a borrowed laptop this morning. You may be interested in this post below, from Tom Laney, a Ford worker with 31 years in the assembly plant in St. Paul and a New Democracy member. Tom is replying here on an autoworkers' list to a worker at another plant, Doug Hanscom. Doug responded on the autoworker list to my Open Letter to Nader. In his reply, Doug said that he is all for revolution, agrees that we need one, but desn;t expect to see one in his lifetime; in the meantime, Doug believes we should make an assault on Solidarity House ("Sod House"), HQ of the UAW, throw the bastards out, and take over the UAW. Dave Stratman ******************* >From Tom Laney (tlaney-AT-pressenter.com) Hi Doug, Good people have been picketing SOD House forever. A lot of things end there but the democratic revolution will never begin on that traitorous doorstep. It is more like the consolidated, dictatorial power at SOD house will continue to push it's own revolt to destroy solidarity and install dog eat dog everywhere. That is going to go on until there is a solidarity movement independent of and opposed to competitiveness powerful enough to stop it. We should refuse to even acknowledge them as "union" since they are the opposite. If you're looking for a solidarity movement, you have to see that what is at SOD House is the opposite of Solidarity. You have to see that there is no "there" there at SOD House. Trying to start a solidarity movement there just isn't going to happen. "Reforming" the UAW, is like suggesting that the original UAW join the AFL company union to "reform" it. Of course they didn't do that because reforming Capitalism is a waste of time. They started their own, independent movement which became the UAW. And today, it is clear that it is easier to start a revolution for democracy than reform the traitorous UAW. Is there anyone left out there suggesting that today's UAW is any less of a company union that the AFL company union of the 1930's? And if we all agree that the UAW is a company union and understand what that means, then should we be trying to reform Ford, GM and GE? Our democratic revolt will mean something entirely different. Democratic revolution stems from our principled friendships on the job and around our homes, it is based in solidarity and direct action and grows as we are able to connect ourselves in conversations about we exercise our power. It means seeing who our friends really are, persuading them that we all need to get back to solidarity and direct action. We need to make it clear that worker who trust other workers in slowdowns can be build that direct action solidarity into shutting down the docks. You say you will never see the revolution in your lifetime? I say there are little revolutions going on everyday. When one worker assists another when the Forduaw program says throw people away, friendly assistance becomes a revolutionary act. Some years ago, I argued with Owen Bieber about there being no difference between Clinton and Bush on NAFTA. This was not long after Clinton, who had broken a UAW strike, was being held up as the reformer. That was the contest with Bush 1. Pete Kelly, an old picketer of SOD House along with being a great guy, was fairly angry with me. Pete said, "We've got to get rid of Bush! Nothing else matters." And that is the way Pete retired from the UAW, joining Bieber's push for the lesser of two weevils. So we got Clinton, who starved somewhere between 1 to 1.5 million innocent people in Iraq, dismantled welfare for the poor, and whose favorite "union" was the strikebreaking, dog eaters at SOD House. Did we win? Voting for evil does what? Mass Refusal is not apathetic or passive. Mass Refusal calls on voters to think abut what it means to support evil. (Even the lesser of two evils is still evil.) Mass Refusal suggests that good people should refuse to participate in the Presidential charade and instead, organize meetings with other good people to talk about what democracy really means. Mass Refusal asks people to think about real change, think about how we can gain a society based in solidarity instead of greed? Mass Refusal suggests to people that things can only change for the better when good people organize themselves in direct action to change the country and world to happy places for everyone. Mass Refusal is a strike for common sense. Mass Refusal also suggests that we stop cooperating with bad stuff. Why are we assisting our enemies? In order to do anything good we first have to stop supporting, participating in and cooperating with nonsense WHILE calling for solidarity. We should all stop going to joint meetings and call for worker meetings. We should all stop paying for nonsense politics like UAW-CAP and the Democrats and call for real democracy. We should all refuse to do more work and do less work and create a shorter day and more jobs. We should refuse to join Sweeney and the Finger in Miami to save us from "bad" competition and start calling for dock closure until every worker in the world has a good wage. We should stop belittling the bad folks and find the good ones. We should stop looking for democracy and hope amongst the Capitalists and start seeing it in our own friends. That's the kind of revolution New Democracy is talking about. In order to win the Accuride strike, we needed worker to worker, local to local connections to discuss how we Mass Refuse to handle any of the struck work. We lost at Accuride because we don't have those kind of connections anymore. We don't even have the connections to discuss building connections and direct action. We don't have them because the UAW dictators did their best to wipe them out. We also don't have them because too many people go the wrong way for solutions which is to say up rather than across the country. The answers for solidarity and direct action are found laterally, between ourselves and our communities not in the hierarchy of the once great UAW. What if Bush is re-elected? We still need to organize. What if Kerry wins? He's already committed to 40,000 more troops in Iraq. He's already committed to the war industrial profiteers and the ruling class. He's already lecturing peace people about "reality". He's already committed to corporate tax cuts. He certainly is NEVER going to help us win slowdowns and strikes and shut down the docks. But his win may stop many good people who are now organizing against Bush from doing much at all. Like Clinton, he is a far better liar than the dopey Bush. Sometimes it helps to understand who the enemy is. I understand that the UAW's concerted dog eat dog activity over the past 25 years has caused many people to turn on themselves. I know my own plant has its share of sucks and snitches to make us believe we can't trust each other. These people are there in all our plants causing us great disappointment every day. On the other hand, as we look laterally, we can also see lots of good, frustrated people. They help each other out on their jobs and continue to stand up to the (Forduaw) bosses. Most of them don't believe they can do much more than that because of the disappearance of wide solidarity. We need Mass Refusal to believe we can't connect these good people and start a democratic movement. Mass Refusal to lose is what we need. And we can only get that by having faith and confidence that our friends at work are like millions of other people in our country and world. If we just see them as the answer and keep working on the solidarity conversation about direct action we can change our factories and world to the way we want them. Tom --- StripMime Warning -- MIME attachments removed --- This message may have contained attachments which were removed. Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005