Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:34:46 -0500 From: Nate Holdren <nateholdren-AT-gmail.com> Subject: Re: AUT: Marazzi's La Place des Chaussettes Hi Steve, Lowe, Angela, ervyone- Having some computer and time management issues, doesn't leave a lot of time for hunting up citations and providing worthwhile answers to questions. Steve, what's this what is to be done article you're talking about? I don't recall if the new book specifically uses the term class composition or not, but it seems more open to that type of analysis. I do have some concerns and such though, along the same lines as yours Steve. There's a lot about democratic representational structures, along the same lines as the piece that caused waves onlist a while back, the one HN wrote that seemed to be addressing global elites, arguing why Empire is a better idea for them than imperialism. There's also some short laudatory remarks on the Justice For Janitors campaign of SEIU (celebrated in Ken Loach's film Bread and Roses). Maybe I'm just a bitter ultralefty, but the treatment seemed a little simplistic and one-sided, given the folks I know who've been or still are members and staff of that union. Angela, I think the citizenship stuff falls away. I don't remember if it's present or not - certainly if it is it's a small enough part of the book that it didn't stick with me. (Sorry to be so vague, I've been reading a lot of Negri lately in english and spanish and it gets hard to keep straight in my head where he says what, exactly.) One thing I like in the book is that they identify two ways to understand multitude - as a critical or deconstructive maneuver (my terms), where unity and identity (state, people, etc) is shown to be actually multiplicity and an operation of force; and as a political project. The second sense is the sense that refers to living labor today as political subject, the proletariat tends to produce itself politically as multitude. There are still moments that sound like the Clash of Titans - multitude is already present on earth and is duking it out with capital - but this is definitely qualified by the talk of tendency. In this way I think class composition and such can enter back into the analysis (not sure if HN see it that way or not) - in that the becoming-multitude of the proletariat is made possible by the technical composition, and require political action and struggle to bring about (recomposition). It is unclear, though, if this means struggling and organizing, or if it means organization (ie, one organization, the concern Steve expressed). gotta run. be well, Nate On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:19:47 +1000, Steve Wright <pmargin-AT-optusnet.com.au> wrote: > But even if *the form* of traditional leninism is said to be longer > applicable, isn't there still a sense of a specialised organisation that > must *force* a break with capital? That's how I understood Negri's > recent essay 'What is to be done with "What is to be done"?' > > Steve > > > > ".: s0metim3s :." wrote: > > > Nate: > > > > ... > > : something to the effect that 'perhaps > > : the hierarchical nature of the > > : Bolshevik organization is why the > > : Bolshevik's ended up recreating the > > : state', which from what I've been told > > : is a fairly critical thing for > > : Negri to say about Lenin etc. (Of > > : course nowhere near critical enough > > : for my own sectarian tastes...) > > > > Nor mine. Negri's 'crit' of Lenin doesn't seem to > > much further than 'Leninism was an adequate form > > of organisation then, but not now.' I'd be > > interested if anyone knows of anything more > > substantial (ie., actually critical) than this. > > > > I do have a specific question Nate. Do they still > > talk about global citizenship and the basic > > income? If so, is it a repeat of the way they > > talk about them in _Empire_? > > > > Angela > > _______________ > > > > <end message> > > > > --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > > --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu --- > --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005