From: Martin Hardie <z3118338-AT-student.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: AUT: Fwd: [VT_THEORY] on empire and negri
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:42:05 +0200


isn't this the point implicit in Hardt's thesis?
different models of organisation are consonant with the dominant forms of 
production????


On Thursday 26 August 2004 09:29, benjamin rosenzweig wrote:
> So is the point here that if Hardt was around in Lenin's time he would have
> supported the Bolshevik party as the model of organisation, consonant with
> the dominant forms of production?
>
>
> stevphen shukaitis <stevphen-AT-greenpeppermagazine.org> wrote:
> i was talking to hardt this weekend after the life after capitalism
> conference - and he was making this argument that lenin, if alive, would
> support the model of non-hierarchal networked models for organizing on the
> basis that the organization of resistance should be consonsant with the
> means of production (ie the whole thing about the rise of imaterial labor
> and such). my initial response to this was a big "so what? it doesn't
> really matter to me whether lenin says" - but after dropping the issue of
> lenin, it seemed more intriguing, the relation between organization of
> work relations and resistance to them needing to have some degree of
> consonance. now such could be taking to ridiculous levels (ie that
> resistance to feudalism should have taken the form of the leadership of
> counter-feudal lords, or that resistance to slavery would be best
> accomplished through alternatuve forms of slavery, etc . . .), but it did
> strike me as being somewhat interesting - so I wanted to throw that out
> there.
>
> cheers.
> stevphen
>
> > Nate Holdren wrote:
> >>Virno talks about the multitude as an ambivalent form, just like the
> >>proletariat, and talks about 'postmodern fascism' as being a form the
> >>multitude can take in addition to the radical forms Negri identifies.
> >>I know Virno and Agamben and others worked on a journal called Luogo
> >>Comune (sp?) dedicated, among other things, to exploring postmodern
> >>fascism. Bits of the journal are around the net in Spanish, probably
> >>in Italian as well. I think points about fascism can be overstated but
> >>I think the idea might be helpful for understanding the religious
> >>right and fascists in our country, and maybe the Lega Nord in Italy
> >>etc.
> >>
> >>On thing that's often not clear to me is how the term multitude
> >>applies (and whether Negri and Virno have different uses of the term)
> >>- whether it means 'class in itself' or 'class for itself'. Sometimes
> >>one, sometimes the other I think. The new Negri/Hardt is clearer on
> >>some of this, but not conclusively to my mind.
> >>
> >>best,
> >>Nate
> >
> > This rendering of 'the multitude' seems closer to that of Balibar, who
> > in _Masses, Classes, Ideas_, _Spinoza and Politics_ and a couple of
> > other places tries to rethink Marx's use of 'the proletariat' as a
> > 'class for itself' along the lines of Spinoza's concept of the multitude
> > as he understands it. In Balibar there doesn't seem to be a multitude
> > in itself, only a potentiality existing in forms of subjectivity
> > inherent to the diverse practices of domination in class societies.
> > Maybe the real issue is a shift in Negri's work on the multitude post
> > _The Savage Anomaly_ or even _Insurgencies_? Certainly Balibar, Montag,
> > Macherey et al seem to have been much more sympathetic to the 1980s and
> > 1990s material than to _Empire_. See, for example, Montag's very
> > appreciative comments on Negri in _Bodies, Masses, Power_ and his review
> > article on _Insurgencies_ in HM a few years ago. There are also
> > discussions of what seems similar to 'postmodern fascism' as you
> > describe it in the books of Balibar and Mike Hill that appeared this
> > year (i.e., _We, the People of Europe?_ and _After Whiteness_
> > respectively). Thanks for posting the link to the Virno book, I will
> > certainly read it when I find time, as what you have said here of it
> > sounds very promising.
> >
> > I hope to publish an interview with Warren Montag (which has already
> > appeared in Greek) in the next few months (in the next issue of
> > borderlands) that has some critical comments on _Empire_. We will
> > certainly publish an interview with Mike Hill in that issue on
> > whiteness. Hopefully at some point in the future we will have some
> > papers discussing _The Multitude_ if that text generates sufficient
> > interest; certainly comparative discussions of that text with that of
> > Virno could be interesting.
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> > --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>
> stevphen shukaitis
> Guest Editor, "Life Beyond the Market" issue
> www.greenpeppermagazine.org
>
> Greenpepper Magazine
> CIA Office
> Overtoom 301
> 1054 HW
> Amsterdam
> The Netherlands
> Phone: 31 020 779 4912
> AIM: foucaultisdead
>
>
>
> --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
>
> --- StripMime Warning --  MIME attachments removed ---
> This message may have contained attachments which were removed.
>
> Sorry, we do not allow attachments on this list.
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
>
>
>      --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---

-- 
::::::::::::::::::
http://auskadi.tk
+ 34 665757391
+ 34 944668670
::::::::::::::::::



     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---