Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:30:49 -0500
From: Nate Holdren <nateholdren-AT-gmail.com>
Subject: Re: AUT: Multitudes


Angela-
Good idea. Perhaps a whole series, including a critical history of
Lenin(ism) called "Why did they do that?" and an assessment of
Leninist groupuscules now called "Are you STILL not done?"
Nate

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:39:12 +1000, .: s0metim3s :.
<s0metim3s-AT-optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> Maybe there can be a companion volume, Doug. 'What
> is to be undone?'
> 
> Doug's piece is here. I'd hardly call it too
> anti-Leninist; but maybe that's just me.
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/2001/2001-February/002
> 373.html
> 
> And there's a not--too-impressed piece on the
> conference here:
> http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettim
> e-l-0102/msg00083.html
> 
> Angela
> _______________
> 
> : Interesting. Back when it was said that
> 
> 
> : Verso would publish the
> : volume (I'm assuming this is the Essen
> : conference you're talking
> : about), I was told that my contribution
> : wouldn't be included, because
> : it was perceived as too anti-Leninist.
> : Is that still the case?
> :
> : Doug
> 
>     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
>


     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---