Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 15:16:48 -0600
From: Nate Holdren <nateholdren-AT-gmail.com>
Subject: Re: AUT: Dependency theory


Hi MJ-
I'll debate the decadence thing with you. Here's a start: 
First, you're wrong! Whatever it was you were saying.
Second, I'm serious, if you can get the ball rolling.
Nate

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:26:17 -0800 (PST), mj <mjlistservs-AT-yahoo.com> wrote:
 
> that debate would have been a lot more fruitful if it turned to debate over the decadence theory. 

> You know, the decadence theory:
> http://www.geocities.com/aufheben2/auf_2_dec.html


     --- from list aut-op-sy-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---