File spoon-archives/avant-garde.archive/avant-garde_1994/avant.may2.94, message 18


Date: Sun, 15 May 1994 11:31:20 -0500
To: avant-garde-AT-world.std.com
Subject: Re: SI


Tristan Riley writes:

>Tad Kepley writes:
>>No, one shouldn't take "resoundingly yes" as a claim that the SI was
>>"resoundingly...defeatist". You'd better re-read his question.
>>
>
>Q: Isnt' it slightly defeatist to...?
>A: Resoundingly yes.
>What am I missing in this reading and what am I to learn in
>re-reading?

Simple logic, Tristan.  In response to the question, Tad was saying that,
yes, it's resoundingly defeatist to do [something].  He didn't say he
agreed that that the SI did or believed that something.

   --Dave.

--
Dave Mandl
dmandl-AT-panix.com



   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005