Date: Sun, 15 May 1994 11:31:20 -0500 To: avant-garde-AT-world.std.com Subject: Re: SI Tristan Riley writes: >Tad Kepley writes: >>No, one shouldn't take "resoundingly yes" as a claim that the SI was >>"resoundingly...defeatist". You'd better re-read his question. >> > >Q: Isnt' it slightly defeatist to...? >A: Resoundingly yes. >What am I missing in this reading and what am I to learn in >re-reading? Simple logic, Tristan. In response to the question, Tad was saying that, yes, it's resoundingly defeatist to do [something]. He didn't say he agreed that that the SI did or believed that something. --Dave. -- Dave Mandl dmandl-AT-panix.com
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005