Date: Sun, 28 May 1995 13:32:03 -0400
Subject: Re: Simon Ford's article
>The concept of the avant-garde in context of our post-modern situation
>is valid, of course.
But the concept of post-modern is limping, if not permanently lame. It's an
"oh I'm gonna be the next thing" sort of sentiment; while remaining too lazy
to even give that next thing a clear name that makes any reference to its
content or direction.
"Post-modern" is not avant-garde. It's the sort of empty, Orwellian
terminology that true avant-gardes have never embraced. The conceit of the
"post-modern" that they are avant-garde is what's giving avant-garde a bad name.
\/\/ I-I I T = < [ whitfb-AT-dorsai.org ] > = nyc usa
--- from list avant-garde-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005