Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 10:29:02 -0400 From: ostrow-AT-is2.nyu.edu (Ostrow/Kaneda) Subject: FLUXLIST: Q: on Avantgardists' self-difinition as avantgarde >Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 16:52:53 +0900 >To: FLUXLIST-AT-scribble.com >From: YN8K-WTY-AT-asahi-net.or.jp (Kiyo Wataya) >X-Sender: YN8K-WTY-AT-po.asahi-net.or.jp (Unverified) >Subject: FLUXLIST: Q: on Avantgardists' self-difinition as avantgarde >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Sender: owner-FLUXLIST-AT-scribble.com >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: FLUXLIST-AT-scribble.com > >Dear all > >Sorry for my poor writing in English. >I am a graduate student of science of art in Japan. >I am considering of the transformation of avant-garde discourse in art. > >The artists so-called "historical avantgarde" after Peter Burger, for example, >futurists, dadaists, surrealists, did they call themselves "avantgarde", or >did the scholar give the name of avantgarde later? >Also, did artists in 1960's such like fluxus artists or Kaplow feel >themselves "avantgarde", in spite of the main critical discourse of "the >end of avantgarde" >in those days? >Meanwhaile, how about the formalistic artists themselves? Certainly Greenberg >called them "avantgarde" starategically. > >I would appreciate your assistance. >Thank you. > > > >Kiyo Wataya in Nara, Japan >YN8K-WTY-AT-asahi-net.or.jp > --- from list avant-garde-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005