Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 13:29:04 -0600 From: ann klefstad <klefkal-AT-cp.duluth.mn.us> Subject: Re: a few new direction's Sterlling wrote: >exactly; what I was getting at was that the computer could, I'm sure one >day, replace the cinema entirely; don't need Sharon or Brad or Wynnie or >Canoe anymore, just punch in what you want, explosion here, boob there... >;lkh;kjhd298349287364 and BOOM! movie > > > Nah. If people wanted to invent their own art they'd be doing it already. People do want to be surprised, just they want to be surprised inside narrow parameters. There'll always be combinatoires, those who like assembling more than receiving. And I think that most people will probalby always, like now, like receiving more than assembling. It's a luxury position. And that's why, brad, Web stuff isn't very different from other modes. It opens a door to a few more makers, but as I say, audience is audience. The relationship of |made thing -> audience| is still the same, even if there's a few more makers reaching (and I think numbers stuff is fairly trivial here, because of the extremely low impact of most of these constructions) a few more passives. And such avocational makers have always been around. Raconteurs, the guy who always knows the new joke at work, good cooks, etc.--but perhaps now, unfortunately, such delightful people will all be flogging away making more boring Web pages, and we'll be stuck with email jokes consumed along with Chips Ahoy. Sigh. Klefstad --- from list avant-garde-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005