File spoon-archives/avant-garde.archive/avant-garde_1997/97-02-19.172, message 6


Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 17:03:55 GMT
From: Olivier Michelon <omichelon-AT-magic.fr>
Subject: The coyote wasn't so wild.


I didn't see the movie, but could you  see it as a mutual understanding 
between Beuys and the coyote? An establishment of bounds and positions? 
This is not a dog. This is a non-domesticated, not to mention 
carnivoruos, canine. You wouldn't cuddle it.

        That was a reason of my disappointment,i know that the animal was a
symbol but the coyote was domesticated one, if you look in the movie you can
see the mark of the necklace. It was a very calm wild carnivorous.
        Off cours we could say the coyote was only a representation and he
doesn't have to be dangerous.
        "the word "dog" doesn'bite" 



     --- from list avant-garde-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---



   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005