File spoon-archives/avant-garde.archive/avant-garde_1997/97-04-26.202, message 24


Date: Sat, 05 Apr 1997 21:43:56 -0800
From: blister <pamwil-AT-wco.com>
Subject: luck


  theoretic depictions of the 'other' bug me, perhaps it is that simple-
yet i can't defend some of what i've typed- i have been too stupid too often.
  if this in fact ought to be a arms-length discussion of cognitivity, i
will of course bow out. really. i do not want to be a toothache. the
avant-garde
is way more than robotics and techno-thought tho and i
would assert some people obfuscate the issue with more
disingenuousity than even i can muster. 
  even as some would object to the reference of social
injustice inna discussion about art, we might reckon that
context is ever relevant to aesthetic effect. A world view, a
weltanschauang, is inherently ideological- jameson called it correctly a
'containment strategy'- and so why do the enfranchised bitch about
'unfortunate facts'?
  and why do i so much like stella? 
  the phosphorescence.



     --- from list avant-garde-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---


   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005