Date: Sat, 05 Apr 1997 21:43:56 -0800 From: blister <pamwil-AT-wco.com> Subject: luck theoretic depictions of the 'other' bug me, perhaps it is that simple- yet i can't defend some of what i've typed- i have been too stupid too often. if this in fact ought to be a arms-length discussion of cognitivity, i will of course bow out. really. i do not want to be a toothache. the avant-garde is way more than robotics and techno-thought tho and i would assert some people obfuscate the issue with more disingenuousity than even i can muster. even as some would object to the reference of social injustice inna discussion about art, we might reckon that context is ever relevant to aesthetic effect. A world view, a weltanschauang, is inherently ideological- jameson called it correctly a 'containment strategy'- and so why do the enfranchised bitch about 'unfortunate facts'? and why do i so much like stella? the phosphorescence. --- from list avant-garde-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005