Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 12:55:18 -0700 From: Cody Dennison <cody.dennison-AT-citicorp.com> Subject: Re: lest... Cultural details are dependent on a societal objective, the participation within this objective (an individual's subjectivities) presupposes understanding the paradigm of culture as it relates to the ego. The act of participation must be looked at first before the understanding can be accomplished. Wealth and poverty are, in some sense, arbitrary concepts laid down by remote catagorizational processes; i.e. beauty /wealth/poverty/ is in the eye of the beholder, that is, in some sense. Or something like that... > on a given day, one might preformulate the distance between the rent and > imagination. folks what cauterize the wound with adaptivity assuredly > cannot complain about the resultant scar. if we, in fact, do not know or > understand the cultural detail of wealth and poverty in this time, how many > clever recycles of ego are enough? --- from list avant-garde-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005