Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 22:45:03 +0000 Subject: ART DEMANDING COMMUNITY: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLOQUIUM University of Westminster English Colloquia in association with the School of Architecture presents: ART DEMANDING COMMUNITY; IDENTITY, DIFFERENCE AND THE ENDS OF ART FRIDAY 13TH FEBRUARY 10 AM Speakers include: ANDREW BENJAMIN (Warwick,Philosophy) The Surface in Architecture ALEX DUTTMANN (Middlesex, Philosophy) Art and the Public Sphere DOINA PETRESCU (Paris, Architecture) 'Art of Making' 'Marginality': (excerps of a User's Guide) JOHN BELL (Westminster/Architectural Association) Verbloden, a postcritical moment PIYEL HALDAR (Birkbeck, Law) Aesthetics and Law To be followed by a plenary session, chaired by David Greene (Archigram etc) featuring some of the above, with the additional presence of representative from the architectural/art practices MUF and FAT, plus others. ALL WELCOME ADMISSION FREE University of Westminster Marylebone Road, opposite Baker Street Underground Station Lecture Theatre Two (LT2) Starts 10AM For further information contact: Jon Goodbun David Cunningham Andrew Stott 0171 911 5000 ext 4334 email: jon.g-AT-zoo.co.uk An inter-disciplinary one-day colloquium at the University of Westminster on the 13th of February 1998. The event is to be co-sponsored by the departments of English Literature and Architecture.It is hoped that the day's discussions will focus on a consideration of the relationship between art and the notion of community, particularly in the light of the recent theoretical re-examinations of this latter concept. To what extent, and in what form, does art demand (a) community, or (a) community art? Such a question has from Plato onwards been a, (perhaps the), central concern of the philosophical attempt to rigorously define art and to provide the basis for its judgement. The 'nature' and situation of art, (including literature, architecture etc), within modernity has no doubt complicated this. Firstly in the way in which modern theory has come to question the possibility, and desirability, of both a universal concept of art and of a traditional idea/l of community. Secondly in the way that modern art has itself sought to continually transgress and transform the limits of the 'artistic', but also sought to question or challenge its 'place' within, or in relation to, (the) community. Special attention here will be paid to the nature of the connections between art, history and politics suggested by an idea of community, (whether descriptively or prescriptively), and to the question of whether such an idea necessarily operates by a logic of (communal) identity and, as such, certain processes of exclusion required in order to maintain this identity. Thus a crucial issue would be the extent to which art, and architecture is perhaps the most explicit instance in this context, is called upon to maintain the construction of ideas and forms of community tending towards the conservative. Indeed, one particular form of the postmodern might well be a demand to restore what is concieved of as a more ‘traditional’ relation of art to community. In relation to these issues three central questions will be raised: (i) how art, thinks itself in relation to an 'exterior' community, (ii) how aesthetics and 'theory' utilise a concept of community as the grounding for the definition, judgement and delimitation of art, and (iii) how histories, both of art and mediated through art and theory (including concepts of tradition, heritage etc), are used in the creation, maintenance and repetition of ideas of community and communal self-identity. In resisting conservative response to these questions, a radicalisation is required of the terms within which community is thought. Without necessarily accepting any simple distinction between the two, its is hoped that issues will be addressed at the colloquium in relation to both theories of art and its practice, and to the conjunction between them. It is on this basis that the organisation of this event is to be carried out jointly between members of the university coming from backgrounds both in literary theory and in architecture, providing a forum for discourse between these two disciplines and others in the university and beyond. --- from list avant-garde-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005