Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 16:36:26 -0800 (PST)
From: { brad brace } <bbrace-AT-ncal.verio.com>
Subject: Re: notart



On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, George Free wrote:

> On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, miekal and wrote:
> 
> > so heiko, in your mind, netart is anything that can't be put on cd-rom, 
> > & Im trying to fit some examples into that scheme & can only think of
> > works which are distributed around the network, viruses (or is that
> > viri) & ?
> > 
> 	How about something that uses CGIs and server-side applications, 
> like a database? If it involved collaborative input from users, it 
> couldn't be duplicated on CD-ROM. ...just a quick thought.


"Net-art" is usually a tired modernist rationalization in search of
arts-funding/critical-authentication by appropriating second-hand science.
Silly claims of new "interactivity" usually are also involved... I tend to
follow art-online that isn't necessarily _about some aspect of the Net,
but rather introduces virtual streams, flows and spaces.



The_12hr-ISBN-JPEG_Project                     since 1994 <<<

> episodic              ftp://ftp.wco.com/pub/users/bbrace <
> eccentric             ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/bb/bbrace <
> continuous           ftp://ftp.teleport.com/users/bbrace <
> hypermodern         ftp://ftp.rdrop.com/pub/users/bbrace <
> imagery online   ftp://ftp.pacifier.com/pub/users/bbrace <

Usenet-news: alt.binaries.pictures.12hr/ a.b.p.fine-art.misc
Mailing-list: listserv-AT-netcom.com / subscribe 12hr-isbn-jpeg
Reverse Solidus: http://www.teleport.com/~bbrace/bbrace.html

{ brad brace }  <<<< bbrace-AT-netcom.com >>>>  ~finger for pgp







     --- from list avant-garde-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---