Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 12:40:00 -0600 Subject: Re: the new avant-garde BETA From: David Westling <dwestling-AT-sbcglobal.net> Bill Spornitz, Canadian: > Actually the Canuckistani Peso is doing a lot better these days ;-> > > I don't mean to cause offense, and I understand how, without > consulting the link, my reply would be a little confusing, but this is > what I'm on about: > > it's a trend - life in the US gets worse, and life around the globe > gets worse because of it, and the US punditry nets are full of very > smart people in full conversation madly trying to avoid the questions: > how did this happen, what are we going to do when he's re-elected and > how can we take responsibility for this, seriously? > > Now, I know yours was a harmless art conversation, and I apologize for > interrupting, it's just a little frustrating, that's all. > > -b > > ps - gay mariage? It's the land of the free and the home of the brave, > isn't it? - that pretty much describes those couples and officials > that are making it happen in the States... up here it's just normal > for legislators and jurists to respect our Charter of Rights and > Freedoms, down there it's par-for-the-course for them to f*ck with > such esteemed artifacts of democracy... No doubt Spornitz is already amassing his army North of the Border to prevent W. from carrrying out his nefarious plan to end democracy in the USA...while we ineffectual artistes are carrying on our harmless art converation blithely unaware of the dangers. There are those of us who believe that art is more than just beautifying living rooms and city parks. To be specific, the interwining of art and politics dictates that artists might do better to eschew a direct frontal approach to the problems of our day in favor of focusing on the basic philosophical presuppositions that make everything go. Merely discussing politics at the tip-of-the-iceberg level is not going to do much good. One might do better to ask questions that address the underlying problem, such as: What is the relationship between political liberalism and autonomy? The Liberal assumes that this relationship is without serious conflict, but it's just not the case. Believeing in the notion of the greatest good for the greatest number commits one to a certain subservient status in relation to the society as a whole. The US's winner-take-all political system encourages that mental state of just going along with the program even more than other democracies do. We are now a nation of underlings...the manufacture of consent is a resounding success, and it is my opinion that for any real change to happen something must happen at the level of the individual that ameliorates the dynamic which I have spoken of. I assure you, art has the capacity to engage reality at this level, and having an approach separate from politics as such is important to keep these issues untainted by the pitfalls that appear when a strictly political approach is used. David Westling --- from list avant-garde-AT-lists.village.virginia.edu ---
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005