Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 13:42:14 -0700 Subject: Re: "walk with writing"...with 'pat[]er' Es. Curtis Clark, ASC oscillated letters to punctuate: | | ______________________|______|______________________________________ | | | pat er r ead her r (i)n ge(i)st orm s..it es | | | | wahr d ing w ou l d e sign b(l)ack w ou ld s tep/nor beyon d err | | | | tr es..s pas..s age n flow in g own s elf | | | | p err f it?... | |___________||________|______|_|__________________|_________________| ||.. | | \ | ||... | | \ .. | \ \ | | \ | \ \______| |"(l)"\______________| \______________| "/" .. "?" "(i)" "(i)" Patting her head, patterned read of a never never Herr, [and chipped] rings [of copper exchange in foreign tongues] rinded mind, t(w)o eyeholes to languages' engine Es: a while-ding/wild-thing [("wild thing, you make my heart sing....")] roped through "s...it". There signified (if you'r Sos($)ure/Sosie, see, that here's it's "V". Is "(l)" then barred and or slashed "(/)" from this question; question there posed from the jump to [il] pater, starred to seven [..][..][...] to which it divines a Seurat, ratting on conceptual points. Again [il]["i" "l"] is him. To such DiVisionism how does the question split points, or is it _Sunday on the island of La Grande Jatta_? Step back. Then take the step. "(i) (i)" comes in storms of what sinks with what ships** it from "it [to] es", awarding what "_acephalic man_"* suffixes as even, so(wn) oddly as a pasture or mea()ow, which "(d)o's" even caught there past the "back-woulds" of thought and action. \ / \ing/ _________ * (Bataille, _Visions of Excess_, p. 199, "II. Proposition on the Death of God") ** (...like two nights passing on a ship) __________ entre chien et loup dans lalangue trespasses, Lucio Angelo Privitello
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005