Subject: Re: Romantic Turn Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 19:33:06 -0500 (EST) Greetings Edward, almost thought the lurker's night brisked you away into essential concealment. In _What is called Thinking_ H derives the word "thought" from the Old English verbs _thencan_ (to think) and _thancian_ (to thank). Is an owl perhaps thankful for his thoughts to the night understood (in Heideggers's sense) as a gathering where one remembers what remains forgotten or concealed? Memory he suggest was once 'understood' as thoughtful meditation where one abides with something letting it be, that is, letting whatever is there( es gibt - which is what gives your were asking Lucio?) 'show' itself from itself and so remain in the darkness of thematization, sleep of cognition. Such is the heart of thinking moved by anguish, sparked by emptiness. But this might be too romantic a turn in a phrase, wouldn't want to x-press too much the contracting dissipating mush of language. I started reading from a book which might interest you called _The New Gnosis: Heiddeger, Hillman, and Angels_ by Robert Avens. A nod in the Maelstrom, Ariosto --
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005