Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 13:43:05 -0700
Subject: Punk-tuating imperceptibles




At searching's end, reason w/out end and therefore w/out origin, this
knob noses a lacy veil; laughter not entirely over-ridden by (an hors
w/no name) darting eyes.

Leaps to-(verbally)word dream at "a presto," invention unmoored from
inventory, lists from an original (sheer less than sown) invitation in
so much as 'the leap is a blank;' reason w/out ending implying reason
w/out origin [(there being no first numerical, that is preceeding
reason);  before reason there being neither deliberation (sown) nor
listlessness (sheer)].

Never having an inclination either greater nor finer than another then,
any of which, by this definition, elicits nothing more than what the
hedonistic delight of similarly 'blind' artists from Giacometti to
Rothco reveals through their coloring of vagrant leaps, necessarily
vacant of the slightest fragrance, and stuck therefore between
necessities of representing truth and the impossibility of presenting it
more than indirectly, what sort of leap might we imply today?

Such imperceptible change is Vigilius' target (future) in speculating
on:  "one-nis-ball, two-nis-balls, etc., up to nine-nis-balls and tennis
balls (CA, 32).  So, likewise, one may long at a hearing.  Especially if
you "please read out loud if you're able" (SK), putting forward(?) a
differential structure of signification both temporal and subjective,
and yet neither.

W/a nod in indirect communication
with this chaos of aesthetic questions,

Maldonado

HTML VERSION:

Leaps to-(verbally)word dream at "a presto," invention unmoored from inventory, lists from an original (sheer less than sown) invitation in so much as 'the leap is a blank;' reason w/out ending implying reason w/out origin [(there being no first numerical, that is preceeding reason);  before reason there being neither deliberation (sown) nor listlessness (sheer)].

Never having an inclination either greater nor finer than another then, any of which, by this definition, elicits nothing more than what the hedonistic delight of similarly 'blind' artists from Giacometti to Rothco reveals through their coloring of vagrant leaps, necessarily vacant of the slightest fragrance, and stuck therefore between necessities of representing truth and the impossibility of presenting it more than indirectly, what sort of leap might we imply today?

Such imperceptible change is Vigilius' target (future) in speculating on:  "one-nis-ball, two-nis-balls, etc., up to nine-nis-balls and tennis balls (CA, 32).  So, likewise, one may long at a hearing.  Especially if you "please read out loud if you're able" (SK), putting forward(?) a differential structure of signification both temporal and subjective, and yet neither.

W/a nod in indirect communication
with this chaos of aesthetic questions,

Maldonado