Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 15:49:17 -0400
Subject: Babylon's kean cone...


* 								      *
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ *

..on Belshazzar's w/awl  
                  r 
                  i 
                  t 
                  i 
                  n 
                  g 

with sprinknells; 

oar the zonelated s/hewing of intra-purr-tain-temptshuns: "an other".
P/art I-r(un)g, p/art [sea]-lay, lettered hup-to three, oddly the
fourth. Like chaff ad-dit-ions. Nearly invisible. Or cart-er/ring as
"Cobweb handwriting, traced long and fine with quiet disdain and
resignation:...." (Giacomo Joyce, James Joyce, 1). Nor a B.; Bataille's
that is, or Awl-eee-gh-airy, even; (now possibly greased), but of an
Ion's potential, rhapsode(ad) in the net of the Socratic "I'll find time
to hear you" (531a), of an "I'm quite willing to hear,..." (536e). Such
to your "divine and dynamic",...a mighty poor tense-awl after all. Still
have that sign? Is this the battle of the eye, twice eyed? A gaze? Or is
it, den-lions d/ear cart-er-ringing to be left to a "seer to examine and
judge passages as [phasic thin the nest (D.Carter, Tue, 4 Aug 98)]"?
(Ion, 539 d). Do I walk about as a roaring lion perhaps? (I Peter 5:8).
Is, t/here a "tis oyn eis grammata agathe praxis"? (Protagoras, 345a).
Is it a "swayin'list of items"? Is it a "moist inner difference"? From
rhapsode to general? Cyzicus 1 Ephesus 0. The lather Re-stings place as
weightly as "an idol". [laughter]. And where is this "new letter"
ordered from? Belshazzar's feast? The firmament? [Gnosis see gnosis do,
redux]. Or is a case, (ready for travel), yet closer to home, as what
sweeps the floors of high-dig-ari-Ion's "domain"? (see, Heidegger, Basic
Questions of Philosophy, 2, "The Question of Truth as a Basic Question",
# 8). There dreamt "dry as the moon in the sky", reflected as an
expiation of itself. The artfulness of existence is a "soul/sole"
supposed in the midst of a doing-being-spoken. This wake is also a dream
("test" even), "glownd rownd" never pastingeing its "riverrun" twice,
nor in "{ }-reversal void backwards mode", once. But it w/oar\ks as "nat
language" (or should I say), "in the Nichtian glossery which purveys
aprioric roots for aposteriorious tongues..."? (Finnegans Wake,
83.10-11). And I don't mean mantic Jung's either, by adding-tempts to
what Boehme didn't get "rownd the way from grown control" to.
[laughter]. Nichtian glossery or "Neikos" glas-errantry? The "love us
all 'n' each" still files through it, with Kafka-fingers now doesn't it
as Philia. There's your second "eye for battle", had on the map of
Tendre. 

	Go ahead, "hurlez a ma voix", encore, "venuer, l'ombre que tu deviens,
laisse la meute aller sans que ton pas se presse, Diane a ce qu'ils
vaudront reconnaitra les chiens..." (Lacan, Ecrits I, La chose
freudienne). 

Grand veneur,
entre chien et loup dans
lalangue trespasses,
Lucio[sea] Angelo[saw] Privitello[Ca],"parce que ce n'est pas ca",
e ne cesse pas, ecce l'amur sans pont, comme passerelle