Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 19:16:31 -0700 Subject: A Proposal > Ding dong (k)Nell tied to tracks to draw power against hir will yet almost > covertly, a Spring-killing [threa(d)t? O(a)r as weapon? Paddle?]. Inevitable > mysogynism of in-tense-shun? (K)not purring? This nod attempts to tempt yer found-because-'finding' and so erring "lettered hup-to-three", however lachrymose, 'Dudly' or lethal the lip service. S/havings cannot but cart oar (paddle) ring. Can they? Can you? At 'certain' points 'even' cobwebs cling with the iron grip of the slightest hint of disdain or resignation. Therefore, by turns we alert ourselves or entertain what may be read as escape (there being no word for 'inscape'). This nod takes its cue from what is neither heard nor not. Or it is quite willing to wear what you would have it signify having heard; with a 'greased' awl from what you designate an aerie.' How long can a will will to hear or play to entertain your knell or Nell's ear-splitting cries for charity to anyone and the corresponding 'love' for mock futures? If 'the battle of the eye' isn't 'twice eyed' it echoes. Our initial gaze substantiates. A lion will roar but not to paddle. This nod sways with endless listings too; always a 'moist' purr or roar. Life's appointing gaze triggered less philosophy in Heidegger than the re-gaze of philosophy itself, expiration an idyll of an aerie. And because supposition's wake turns (to/ward Kafka:) without argument "against a joke... I came to you with the proposal" (The Castle): the immeasurable territory of tendre. Ventriloquize this nod then too, y/oar dissonant id-entity; in essence affirming multiple difference. W/ a nod in a sea of saws..., D. Socha
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005