Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 23:24:10 -0400
Subject: Nobl-'essa' en-'khora'


. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .

        "'Disapppearance is our future - P. Virilio [as] Orpheus
add[ed]", 'a la queue leu leu', [CD, Wed, 19 Aug 13:11].

        "And as far as Lacan was and ever will be concerned, tornadoes
are merely exciting _subjects_[?] for shitty films." quips la 'galopin'
[Edward, Wed, 19 Aug 19:13 (my emphasis)].

        "Lucio plays with Ariosto." [Moore, Edward, Wed, 19 Aug].

. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/           \~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .

[_semibreve andante_]

        ...and what has disappeared then are o)[des] through
iv)[fore's!] as futura(w)l of what can't cut the lather in the letter's
crystal stream, o(a)r row through the folds of leather, where I also
give* "turpes raucis bubonibus umbras...et strigis oua tulit" (shameful
shelter to noisy horned owls...and screech-owl, [Ovid, _Amores_, I.12).
But also t'aching it a-way, "magicked away, [as once the cows,
threatened there by Apollo who] then laughed to find his quiver gone
too." "te, boves olim nisi reddidisses per dolum amotas, puerum minaci
voce dum terret, viduus pharetra risit Apollo." (Horace, _Odes_, 1 (I
10). 

        Mobilis in mobili, hey CD, or is it more like Ctesibius of
Alexandria's "water organ"? (Virilio, _The Aesthetics of Disappearance_,
106). Have I not 'talked to yoUR eyes'? Recall the mention of Abel Gance
by Virilio, and there disappearance is _Ur_'s future awl-to-gott-her(e),
as a picnoleptic ubiquity. [laughter]. Does such a "forest mazedly
follow[] Orpheus [on CD] singing"? (Horace, _Odes_, I,12), or should
this Virilio mention be taken back to the future with _The Lost
Dimension_, say with "The Morphological Irruption"? Or how'z about "La
regne de la delation optique", (Virilio, _Le Monde Diplomatique_ Aout
1998, n. 533, p. 20). Si vedra'.

	Et, tu Edward? (Right Rick?).** Is that "tornado" really a "subject"?
Impersonal subject, as in pure grammatical subject, the 'reciprocal
subject', o(a)r the 'personal subject'? On Lacan's account the "subject"
is the subject of the unconscious, and then (kicking up the dust)
shouldn't you distinguish the 'subject' of the statment, and the
'subject' of the enunciation? So then the "tornado" is also an effect of
language. Thus $ (S barred). As far as "shitty", well there's "The"
gift. Allora, Edward, _Da capo sin' al segno_. (Check out Lacan's _The
Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis_ ). But doesn't 'torna'
always 'do'? Allora! Da Nietzsche sin' al segno! And you say I play with
Ariosto,......[laughter]. By the way, how are you doing with the
Bataille pages Ari? "In a sense it's true to say human sobbing gives a
faint foretaste of eternity." (Bataille, _On Nietzsche, February-April
1944, p. 55). 

. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\            /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . 

entre chien et loup dans
lalangue trespasses,
Lucio "a"(n'th)gelo of what is Privi-(to)thelos

*(see Nietzsche, _Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality_, #
445, and # 574).
** et #447