Subject: La-can't-here
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 14:24:22 PDT


The following is a reconstruction of a message erased earlier today:

If rationality is being-en-garde and on parole, then play is freedom
on to real discourse. This brings us to the space in between that is
not necessarily based in both you and I. If "la" langue is born from
desire (to complete an "ideal" lack?) originally masque-revealed, as
needed postulated possible self-identity, then to whom does the real
intersubjective language precover in truth? [Not that Other! Never!]
Narcissus and his mirror were content, no matter what the conditions
that hypothetically led to this meeting. The death of his situation,
or discontent, was going over into one's self-possession. "I'm-a-go"
calls after "I'm ego". A fault is founded in this chronic-logic, but
is always trance-fixed as time overreaching faults the boundary of a
straight line. This is set up as to not permit any exit. Definitely!

Or, can one subvert language to the point of establishing solipsism?



L                A         U       U     GGGGGG     H       H     !
L               A A        U       U    G      G    H       H    !!! 
L              A   A       U       U   G            H       H    !!!
L             A     A      U       U   G    GGGGG   HHHHHHHHH    !!!
L            AAAAAAAAA     U       U   G        G   H       H     !
L           A         A    U       U    G      G    H       H     
LLLLLLLLL  A           A    UUUUUUU      GGGGGG     H       H     ! 


THE USELESS AND TIME CONSUMING NATURE OF THE CARE OF CARE IS WONDER!



______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com