From: amd <A.M.Dib-AT-lboro.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: until now 
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 13:45:51 +0100


Carter wrote:
>:
>
>
>
>until now it did not have a name and may still not,  

as it *is* either the same or the other. In either case, the unamed name
that is not at aim is name able. *Now* and *may* two figures which have a
say...  

 >not motionfully that is 

Being has no horizon except the non arisen.  

>it is true that someone or some thing could have might have found out what
they were gradually on 

Nothingness has found both someone and some thing while the latter is still
searching for the former. Each is given in the very act that given is ridden. 

>to this new sigh having departed a space of relative origins

Origins have no relatives. They are born of that nothingness that brings
forth the truth of the relative. 

>one's own not owned somehow through one

Interstices which are not one but o-n-e. They are an awe which brings a
discrete incretion out of a non one that is a o-n-e. If one is won, nothing
can be run.    

>those particular in that way

The *way* tranverse that particular away from its particularity. Allevation
works with certain duration

> particular prism one vines oneself many selves to spring from and be in
one's becoming

Many is a gain of a number. Selves are countable exluding thus duration.
Such becoming is just re-being that tames on thames Heracletus' all flowing
names. It is just the same.