Date: Sat, 29 Jul 95 10:14:59 EDT From: ma-AT-dsd.camb.inmet.com (Malgosia Askanas) Subject: literality It seems to me that there is, on these lists, a tendency towards a certain narrow-minded literality -- on the Deleuze list one must talk "schizo", on baudrillard one must disappear. But if it is true -- as I think it is, and you'll correct me if not -- that these people regard their thinking as a box of tools from which one chooses what suits one and discards the rest, then they do assume some kind of a choosing "I", some kind of purpose for which this "I" does the choosing, and the possibility of talking about these tools from a perspective in which one might or might not choose them. Or maybe this toolbox view is not true of B? If not, then what _is_? - malgosia ------------------
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005