Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 15:11:52 -0600 (CST)
From: Omar Nasim <umnasimo-AT-cc.UManitoba.CA>
Subject: Re: Warhol/sci-fi/turnips/death


On Wed, 18 Dec 1996, martin stepanek wrote:

> As I see it this argument is wrong because of the following reason:
> You make a shift from your understanding of "conscious death" as an 
> experience which the subject makes to a understanding of "death" as I put 
> it: As a objective state of a body and mind which is not reversable. But 
> this second understanding of death refers to the "outside" of death, i. 
> e. how it looks like for the people alive. Talking about the 
> (maybe possible) subjective experience of a dead person is something 
> completly different.

	Thankyou very much Martin for this reply.  Yes it seems apprent 
that I am jumping from one state to another (i.e. subjective to objective 
and the other way around).  This is I have done as a purely Functional 
Argument against the pervious posts.  In other words, this "jumping" is 
not the point, it is to make a point, its an a posteriori form of 
argument, that should not, and cannot be used against the argument.  I am 
sorry for any misunderstandings.....
Chow,
Omar Nasim