File spoon-archives/baudrillard.archive/baudrillard_1997/97-04-26.234, message 43


From: Philip Jenkins <P.Jenkins-AT-btinternet.com>
Subject: Radical Alterity
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 97 18:21:33 GMT


Hello to everyone on the list!

Although I've been on the list for a couple of months  I haven't yet participated in any of the 
debates ... and I thought that now is a good a time as any to have a go! So, the question 
that I would like to pose - one that I am finding some quite considerable difficulty in 
answering ... - is what happens to the concept of Radical Alterity in the simulacra?

As far as I can understand, Baudrillard seems to be talking in one form or another in almost 
all of his texts about the notion of infinite or radical Alterity ... even if he doesn't use these 
exact terms all that often. For example, in his text De La Séduction,  radical Alterity is the 
infinite space beyond the ambivalent boundry of the productivist political economy, of the 
discourse of the phallus. It is the space of symbolic non-determinacy, of Baudrillard's 
feminin ... a feminin that in this respect is that of Derrida's chora, a concept defining the 
space of radical non-definition that Irigary is also perhaps driving at. This concept of radical 
Alterity is also the xs, La Part Maudite that Bataille refers to and it is what deconstructs the 
grounding binaries of the political economy (L'=C9change symbolique et La Mort etc.) ... as far 
as I can see, so far so good.

The problem is how the notion of Radical Alterity is felt in the simulacra, how does the 
always xs deconstruct the simulacra? Is the simulacre beyond deconstruction in that it no 
longer posits grounding binaries in order to substantiate itself? Is the simulacra a sort of 
"beyond the dialectic of the real "( and thus grounding in general) in which alterity takes on 
terroristic or viral or metastatic incarnations? ... alterity entered into events? The simulacre 
can never be beyond the deconstructive threat of alterity, there will always be xs - it is not a 
totalising system (this is an aporia) - so how is it felt? Is the revenge of the object the 
revenge of Radical Alterity?

These are some of the major questions that I've recently come across in my reading and 
would be really grateful for any comments that you have on these. Thanks a lot for your 
imput.

Yours phil






   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005