Date: Sun, 24 May 98 15:36:47 EDT From: Sarah Khan <sfatima-AT-clam.rutgers.edu> Subject: Re: Fw: the perfect person > Op vrijdag, 22-mei-98 schreef Sarah Khan: > snip > > SK> Wait weren't Nietzsche's perfect people the Ubermensch supermen guys.> > SK> Didn't they end up becoming Nazis? > > > Oh no, don't start again this malicious gossip, caused by Friedrich's sis> ter Elisabeth Foster-Nietzsche and a bunch of sundayschool eggheads who e> choed the gossip without reading the author himself or any decent book ab> out him. > But this is to human all to human as well, for humans the perfection will> always be in the eye of the beholder. For superhumans it's according to > Nietzsche the state of mind of the child who celebrates life without > malice and greed. > Bye > > erik I think Erik's favorite philosopher is Nietzsche instead of Baudrillard. But why can't I say it? Why? Isn't that one of the things they tell you when they are teaching you the causes of the 2nd world war? Why the assumption I said "wait weren't Nietzsche's perfect people the Ubermensch supermen guys. Didn't they end up becoming Nazis?" with malice and greed? How do you know I didn't say it because that thought popped up in my mind just like that? Or how do you know I didn't say it because I might be trying to figure out male people by seeing the effect of my words on them as one of the many things in 'all the things you need to know to be a grownup' I might be trying to learn if I happened to be 19? And how come everyone is so quiet now? It's not because of me is it? That's silly- you shouldn't be talking because they are females listening- you should be talking because there are things that need to be said for their own sake. (like Erik just did) ...but if you happen to attract rare thoughtful followers (including females one) who agree with what comes from your personal logic or voice so be it.
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005