From: CathB2-AT-aol.com Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 18:11:52 EDT Subject: Re: Help me make the Postmodern Turn! In a message dated 8/11/99 12:31:25 PM Central Daylight Time, abarcelo-AT-indiana.edu writes: << That would be the romantic interpretation. However, in Baudrillard, there is no subordination of Desire to Destiny (or vice versa). We can say that one *is defined* in terms of the other, but not that it is *created* by it. >> Well, durn. However, the born-again romantic is by no means discouraged at such meager fare since new metaphors are sexier than old ones. This is an absolute, even though I have met recycled old metaphors as good or better than new. (You know who you are!) PS. Do little *birds* mean something like this is a word or "word" or do I just have problems with my browser? This is not rude, my gnosis, as you may have already guessed, is smatterings.
Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005