File spoon-archives/bhaskar.archive/bhaskar_1996/96-09-09.212, message 46


Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 22:50:09 -0600
From: Hans Ehrbar <ehrbar-AT-marx.econ.utah.edu>



I don't think Derek's point can be reduced to the unfortunate
double use of the word "law".  This is not Derek's first posting
on this, and my sense of his argument is:

Derek conceds that the *natural mechanisms* are independent of
human activity and would also be discovered by beings on another
star.  But what is being discovered is never the mechanism itself,
but some approximation to that mechanism.  And Derek wonders whether
other beings would start out with the same approximation as we.

My answer to this is: Derek's underlying ontology is not one of
a stratified world with many layers, but one in which there is
an empirical skin and an infinitely deep cellar underneath.  Since we
can never step down to the depths of this cellar, it will depend
on the transitive dimension which aspect of the generative mechanisms
sitting in this dark cellar will be discovered first.


As I said, I would seek the answer to this in a better exploration of
what it means that the world is "stratified" rather than based on
an infinitely deep cellar.

Does that what I am saying make any sense to you?

Hans E.




   

Driftline Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005